1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(96)00052-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-attribute time-intensity sensory evaluation: A new method for temporal measurement of sensory perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study where the chili burn could interfere with the meat evaluations the two attributes was assessed individually. Alternatively the two attributes could have been rated simultaneously (Duizer, Bloom, & Findlay, 1997;Duizer, Gullett, & Findlay, 1996;Zimoch & Findlay, 1998) this is, however, not a widely used technique (Piggott, 2000), probably because concentrating on two attributes at the same time is considered to be too complex (Dijksterhuis & Piggott, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study where the chili burn could interfere with the meat evaluations the two attributes was assessed individually. Alternatively the two attributes could have been rated simultaneously (Duizer, Bloom, & Findlay, 1997;Duizer, Gullett, & Findlay, 1996;Zimoch & Findlay, 1998) this is, however, not a widely used technique (Piggott, 2000), probably because concentrating on two attributes at the same time is considered to be too complex (Dijksterhuis & Piggott, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations were performed with and without nose clips over three replicate assessment. 10 mL samples were used for all TI evaluations which lasted for a time period of 60 s. The following TI parameters were extracted from the TI curves: maximum intensity (IMax), time to maximum intensity (TMax), area under the curve (AUC) and increasing angle (IAngle) (Duizer, Bloom, & Findlay, 1997), using an Excel Macro provided by Compusense.…”
Section: Sample Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lingering perceptions induced by sweeteners (Ujikawa & Bolini, 2004), bitter compounds (Pangborn, Lewis, & Yamashita, 1983), and trigeminal compounds such as menthol (Gwartney & Heymann, 1996) have been broadly investigated using this technique (See Heymann, 1993 andPiggott, 2000 for a review). Perceptual interactions have also been highlighted between (1) olfactory perception and taste by dual-attribute T-I in chewing gum (Duizer, Bloom, & Findlay, 1997) and by conventional T-I in flavoured sucrose solution (Cliff & Noble, 1990), (2) olfactory perception and texture by conventional T-I in whey protein gels (Weel et al, 2002); and (3) more recently between hot trigeminal perception from capsaicin, flavour and texture in pork patties (Reinbach et al, 2007). But the main constraint of T-I is that the evaluation is limited to one or two sensory attributes at a time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%