2002
DOI: 10.1081/drt-120015412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying Kinetics and Particle Residence Time in Spray Drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average RT is 3.3 s, which is much lower than the gas residence time (22.4 s), because this RTD was calculated for the primary RT and the particles travel with a high velocity for a short period after leaving the atomiser. Zbicinski et al [21] also concluded from their experimental results that there is no simple relation between gas and particle mean RTs. The RTDs of the different size classes of particles are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Particle Residence Time Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The average RT is 3.3 s, which is much lower than the gas residence time (22.4 s), because this RTD was calculated for the primary RT and the particles travel with a high velocity for a short period after leaving the atomiser. Zbicinski et al [21] also concluded from their experimental results that there is no simple relation between gas and particle mean RTs. The RTDs of the different size classes of particles are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Particle Residence Time Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3 The cocurrent dryer is the most universal and the most often used type of drying chamber. 25 In addition, the drying kinetics and particle behavior inside the cocurrent drying chamber are the best known. On the industrial scale, cocurrent chambers are used for drying substances that are relatively easy to dry and for drying at considerably high temperatures without risking overheating of the product.…”
Section: Cocurrent Dryersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually considered that hot gas and droplets are moving in parallel within the drying chambers [70]. This simulation approach is widely used to model product characteristics during spray drying where tall-form spray dryers were used [72,109,110,112]. A major advantage of the 1-D approach is the capability to evaluate the "average" behavior (temperature, moisture concentration and velocity profiles) of the powder and hot gas following drying time or dryer height integration.…”
Section: "1-d" (Finer-scale) Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1-D simulation approach has previously been used to model spray drying operations due to its ability to predict a product's moisture, temperature and velocity profiles throughout drying [30,31,48,66,70,72,73,109,112]. Three main components to formulate the 1-D simulation tool for modeling spray drying processes are (1) drying kinetics data from laboratory-scale experiments and drying kinetics model, (2) a set of appropriate mathematical equations, and (3) a process calculation tool (e.g.…”
Section: One-dimensional Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%