The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
88
11
9
2
Citation Types
2
53
1
0
Year Published
Range
1999
19992024
2024Publication Types
Select...
88
9
6
Relationship
0
103
Authors
Journals
Cited by 103 publications
(56 citation statements)
References 33 publications
2
53
1
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…15 The Cochrane review on drugs for the treatment of very high blood pressure in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular drug, and on what is known about adverse effects. 6 On performing a search in PubMed authors found that there were two RCT s (Vermilion et al, IA Raheem et al) similar to present study. 16,17 The principal finding of IA Raheem et al was that the time taken to achieve the target blood pressure was almost the same with both drugs (45 min for labetalol and 30 min for nifedipine).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 76%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…15 The Cochrane review on drugs for the treatment of very high blood pressure in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular drug, and on what is known about adverse effects. 6 On performing a search in PubMed authors found that there were two RCT s (Vermilion et al, IA Raheem et al) similar to present study. 16,17 The principal finding of IA Raheem et al was that the time taken to achieve the target blood pressure was almost the same with both drugs (45 min for labetalol and 30 min for nifedipine).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 76%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The most recent Cochrane review found no good evidence that one short acting antihypertensive is better than another, with the exception of ketanserin, which is associated with more persistent hypertension 53. The Cochrane inclusion and exclusion criteria differed somewhat from those in this study, but the most important difference seems to be in the reviews' methods.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…23,24 The Cochrane review on agents for severe hypertension therapy in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive agent should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular agent, and on adverse effects. 17 In the present study, our data showed that oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol are effective in controlling severe hypertension in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The time interval before a new hypertensive crisis coming after initial effective blood pressure control in the nifedipine group was similar to the labetalol group.…”
Section: Adverse Effects On Maternal or Foetal
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The maternal and foetal risks are decreased by lowering of blood pressure to safe levels with antihypertensive agents . The Cochrane review on agents for severe hypertension therapy in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive agent should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular agent, and on adverse effects . In the present study, our data showed that oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol are effective in controlling severe hypertension in patients with severe pre‐eclampsia.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 50%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…15 The Cochrane review on drugs for the treatment of very high blood pressure in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular drug, and on what is known about adverse effects. 6 On performing a search in PubMed authors found that there were two RCT s (Vermilion et al, IA Raheem et al) similar to present study. 16,17 The principal finding of IA Raheem et al was that the time taken to achieve the target blood pressure was almost the same with both drugs (45 min for labetalol and 30 min for nifedipine).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 76%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The most recent Cochrane review found no good evidence that one short acting antihypertensive is better than another, with the exception of ketanserin, which is associated with more persistent hypertension 53. The Cochrane inclusion and exclusion criteria differed somewhat from those in this study, but the most important difference seems to be in the reviews' methods.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…23,24 The Cochrane review on agents for severe hypertension therapy in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive agent should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular agent, and on adverse effects. 17 In the present study, our data showed that oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol are effective in controlling severe hypertension in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The time interval before a new hypertensive crisis coming after initial effective blood pressure control in the nifedipine group was similar to the labetalol group.…”
Section: Adverse Effects On Maternal or Foetal
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The maternal and foetal risks are decreased by lowering of blood pressure to safe levels with antihypertensive agents . The Cochrane review on agents for severe hypertension therapy in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive agent should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular agent, and on adverse effects . In the present study, our data showed that oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol are effective in controlling severe hypertension in patients with severe pre‐eclampsia.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 50%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…15 The Cochrane review on drugs for the treatment of very high blood pressure in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular drug, and on what is known about adverse effects. 6 On performing a search in PubMed authors found that there were two RCT s (Vermilion et al, IA Raheem et al) similar to present study. 16,17 The principal finding of IA Raheem et al was that the time taken to achieve the target blood pressure was almost the same with both drugs (45 min for labetalol and 30 min for nifedipine).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 76%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The most recent Cochrane review found no good evidence that one short acting antihypertensive is better than another, with the exception of ketanserin, which is associated with more persistent hypertension 53. The Cochrane inclusion and exclusion criteria differed somewhat from those in this study, but the most important difference seems to be in the reviews' methods.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…23,24 The Cochrane review on agents for severe hypertension therapy in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive agent should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular agent, and on adverse effects. 17 In the present study, our data showed that oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol are effective in controlling severe hypertension in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The time interval before a new hypertensive crisis coming after initial effective blood pressure control in the nifedipine group was similar to the labetalol group.…”
Section: Adverse Effects On Maternal or Foetal
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The maternal and foetal risks are decreased by lowering of blood pressure to safe levels with antihypertensive agents . The Cochrane review on agents for severe hypertension therapy in pregnancy concluded that until better evidence is available, the choice of antihypertensive agent should depend on the clinician's experience and familiarity with a particular agent, and on adverse effects . In the present study, our data showed that oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol are effective in controlling severe hypertension in patients with severe pre‐eclampsia.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 50%