2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug delivery to the upper small intestine window using gastroretentive technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
128
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, such a dosage form will be initially of a smaller size to facilitate swallowing, then it increases in size when it gets to the stomach (Streubel et al, 2006). The size of the dosage form required, may be greater than 5 cm in length and a diameter greater than 3 cm (Klausner et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Gastric Residence Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, such a dosage form will be initially of a smaller size to facilitate swallowing, then it increases in size when it gets to the stomach (Streubel et al, 2006). The size of the dosage form required, may be greater than 5 cm in length and a diameter greater than 3 cm (Klausner et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Gastric Residence Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is a convenient route of administration for easy access to the systemic circulation. However, drug absorption via this route can be unsatisfactory and variable even following promising in vitro release profiles (Davis, 2005, Streubel et al, 2006. This makes it difficult to predict the in vivo performance of a drug delivery system (DDS), even though the in vitro data are reproducible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Singh & Kim, 2000;Streubel et al, 2006). The bulk density of FDDS is lower than that of gastric fluids and thus it remains buoyant on stomach contents for a long time in the drug releasing process.…”
Section: Preparation Of Intragastric Fdds By Plasma Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This controlled release technology had made it possible to release drugs at a constant release rate for longer periods of time. However, this benefit had not satisfied a variety of important drugs that (i) are locally active in the stomach, (ii) have an absorption window in the stomach or in the upper small intestine, (iii) are unstable in the intestinal or colonic environment, or (iv) exhibit low solubilities at high pH values [1][2][3]. These limits promoted the development of gastroretentive drug delivery systems (GRDDS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%