Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drowsy and Fatigued Driving Problem Significance and Detection Based on Driver Control Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that drivers will be even more prone to falling asleep behind the wheel with a higher automation level [5]. Conventional driver state monitoring systems are mainly based on analysing the driving behaviour or eye blink behaviour of the driver [6]. Both approaches are not applicable for detecting sleep in a driver during automated driving periods, because the driver does not necessarily have to gaze on the road and can even close her or his eyes while the automation is active.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that drivers will be even more prone to falling asleep behind the wheel with a higher automation level [5]. Conventional driver state monitoring systems are mainly based on analysing the driving behaviour or eye blink behaviour of the driver [6]. Both approaches are not applicable for detecting sleep in a driver during automated driving periods, because the driver does not necessarily have to gaze on the road and can even close her or his eyes while the automation is active.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samiee et al [24] evaluated the arousal level classified as being alert or drowsy using vehicle dynamic data such as vehicle longitudinal position and duration of eye closures, and showed that the proposed method could differentiate between the alert and the drowsy states with an accuracy of more than 87.78%. Eskandarian et al [25] and McDonald et al [26] indicated the effectiveness of such vehicle-based measures for assessing drowsiness.…”
Section: Prediction Of Point In Time With High Crash Risk By Integratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower value of EEG-MPF shows that the arousal level is decreased. EEG-α/β can be calculated as the ration of the sum of α-band (8-12 Hz) power and θ-band (4-7 Hz) power to the power of β-band (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) Hz) power. The higher this value is, the lower the arousal level gets.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Integrated Posterior Probabilities P(h 1 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drowsiness has been shown to undermine driver performance in controlled settings, such as a driving simulator (Contardi, Pizza, Sancisi, Mondini, & Cirignotta, 2004; Thiffault & Bergeron, 2003; Turkington, Sircar, Allgar, & Elliott, 2001; Yuan, Du, Qu, Zhao, & Zhang, 2016). Drowsy drivers have delayed sensory processing ability and perception, need longer periods to react to external stimuli, and have substantially degraded ability to control their vehicle (Eskandarian, Mortazavi, & Sayed, 2012). In understanding the effects of drowsiness on vehicle control, steering wheel movements have emerged as one of the more sensitive measures of the effect of drowsiness on driving behavior (Krajewski & Sommer, 2009; Anthony D McDonald, Lee, Schwarz, & Brown, 2018; Anthony D. McDonald, Lee, Schwarz, & Brown, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%