2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2018.5529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting sleep in drivers during highly automated driving: the potential of physiological parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The trends in physiological parameters were consistent with previous studies [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. Nevertheless, the results showed slight differences in ULF compared to some studies [ 9 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ] which believed that ULF cannot reflect a human’s workload level. After further literature research and analysis, our results were found to be justified.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The trends in physiological parameters were consistent with previous studies [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. Nevertheless, the results showed slight differences in ULF compared to some studies [ 9 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ] which believed that ULF cannot reflect a human’s workload level. After further literature research and analysis, our results were found to be justified.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Studies performed in driving simulators are beneficial in understanding causal analysis as different factors can be controlled [38]. Previous studies have coupled driving simulators with physiological sensors to detect driver states in different contextual settings such as detecting states of being awake versus sleeping in four-hour driving epochs [39], cognitive distraction when the lead vehicle abruptly breaks [40], response to automation takeover when the take over request is offered through different sources [41], and driver's performance and possible cognitive distraction when being exposed to different traffic signs [42]. Driving simulators are safe tools for conducting driving experiments in different environmental conditions, such as crash events, or evaluating drivers' emotional states [43].…”
Section: A Driving Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly investigated physiological-based methods for driver drowsiness detection [22] utilize information based on brain activity (electroencephalography (EEG)) [44][45][46], cardiac activity (electrocardiography (ECG)) [47][48][49], ocular activity (electrooculography (EOG)) [50][51][52], and muscle tone (electromyography (EMG)) [53,54]. Physiological measures are reliable, accurate, and show high potential in differing wakefulness and sleep during driving [5,55]. They change in the very early stages of drowsiness compared to behavioral or vehicle-based ones that have the ability to warn the driver in time [5].…”
Section: Driver Drowsiness Measurement Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%