Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drought Resistance and Its Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 410 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of Ψ tlp in driving stomatal closure has been questioned by several authors (Ali et al ; Turner ) who showed that stomatal closure is more closely related to soil water potential than leaf water potential or Ψ tlp . Further, guard cell turgor, rather than bulk leaf turgor, is more closely related to stomatal function (Blum ; Cowan ). It has also been suggested that the association between turgor maintenance and stomatal control of water use is primarily driven by cavitation‐induced losses of leaf hydraulic conductance ( K leaf ) (Brodribb and Holbrook ; Sperry ) and stomatal conductance can continue despite partial cavitation (Manzoni et al ; Vilagrosa et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of Ψ tlp in driving stomatal closure has been questioned by several authors (Ali et al ; Turner ) who showed that stomatal closure is more closely related to soil water potential than leaf water potential or Ψ tlp . Further, guard cell turgor, rather than bulk leaf turgor, is more closely related to stomatal function (Blum ; Cowan ). It has also been suggested that the association between turgor maintenance and stomatal control of water use is primarily driven by cavitation‐induced losses of leaf hydraulic conductance ( K leaf ) (Brodribb and Holbrook ; Sperry ) and stomatal conductance can continue despite partial cavitation (Manzoni et al ; Vilagrosa et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have also suggested that the link between turgor maintenance and gas exchange is ambiguous (Sperry ) and that stomatal closure is primarily coordinated with loss in leaf hydraulic conductance through cavitation (Brodribb and Holbrook ). As Ψ tlp reflects bulk leaf turgor, stomatal closure may also occur earlier than the Ψ tlp in some species because of chemical signalling or where bulk leaf water potential differs from guard cell turgor (Blum ). Therefore, there is a need to confirm the relationship between Ψ tlp and water potential at stomatal closure for a broader range of species and life‐forms to determine whether Ψ tlp can be used as a trait to characterize stomatal sensitivity to drought stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osmotic adjustment (OA) is due to a net increase in intracellular solutes independent of dehydration, which decreases the cell sap osmotic potential (Turner, ). OA antagonizes dehydration and turgor loss and is increased in drought tolerant cultivars (Blum, ; Blum & Sullivan, ; Cattivelli et al., ; Serraj & Sinclair, ; Vos & Groenwold, ). Genetic variation in OA has been identified (Zhang, Nguyen, & Blum, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evapotranspiration is the most leadership power that affects the soil, plant, and atmospheric continuum of the hydrologic cycle. In previously papers, foretelling of water deficit were mainly based on countervail and apportionment of downpour (Blum, 2011). Generation and selecting for novel incorporations of genes to manufacture genotypes with eminent character performances than those of presenting genotypes, through the goal climate, is the main thematic of plant breeding (Chapman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyer and Westgate (2004) assessed that drought stress is one of the most significant causes of crop yield loss. Drought stress has been often labelled as "complex trait" by genetics (Blum, 2011). Morphological variations are positively associated with genetic diversity but are also dependent on environmental factors, as well as, on the interaction between genotypes and environment (Moose and Mumm, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%