2013
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.2-76.v1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drosophila immune priming against Pseudomonas aeruginosa is short-lasting and depends on cellular and humoral immunity

Abstract: Immune responses are traditionally divided into the innate and the adaptive arm, both of which are present in vertebrates, while only the innate arm is found in invertebrates. Immune priming experiments in Drosophila melanogaster and other invertebrates during the last decade have challenged this dogma, questioning the boundaries between innate and adaptive immunity. Studies on repeated inoculation of Drosophila with microbes reveal a long-lasting cellular immunity adaptation against particular microorganisms.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Injury and infection priming is a memory-like response that is reportedly elicited in several (but not all) insect groups by bacteria, fungi, viruses, parasites and even inert molecules (LPS, heat-killed bacteria) ( Moret and Siva-Jothy, 2003 ; Sadd et al, 2005 ; Moret, 2006 ; Sadd and Schmid-Hempel, 2007 ; Roth et al, 2009 ; Hernández-Martínez et al, 2010 ; Tidbury et al, 2011 ; Tate and Rudolf, 2012 ; Christofi and Apidianakis, 2013 ). Despite the evidence of a widespread phenomenon, the mechanism(s) and molecule(s) associated with the induction of priming are as yet unclear (but see Contreras-Garduño et al, 2015 ; Ramirez et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Injury and infection priming is a memory-like response that is reportedly elicited in several (but not all) insect groups by bacteria, fungi, viruses, parasites and even inert molecules (LPS, heat-killed bacteria) ( Moret and Siva-Jothy, 2003 ; Sadd et al, 2005 ; Moret, 2006 ; Sadd and Schmid-Hempel, 2007 ; Roth et al, 2009 ; Hernández-Martínez et al, 2010 ; Tidbury et al, 2011 ; Tate and Rudolf, 2012 ; Christofi and Apidianakis, 2013 ). Despite the evidence of a widespread phenomenon, the mechanism(s) and molecule(s) associated with the induction of priming are as yet unclear (but see Contreras-Garduño et al, 2015 ; Ramirez et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies showing that after previous exposure to a pathogen, there was specific protection against a subsequent lethal challenge. For instance, after previous contact of Drosophila melanogaster with different bacteria, individuals were able to increase its survival rate and specific phagocytic activity against the corresponding pathogen ( Pham et al, 2007 ; Christofi and Apidianakis, 2013 ). While different strains of Pseudomona aeruginosa elicit defense-specific genes ( Apidianakis et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster employs various non-self recognition receptors that distinguish Gram (−) from Gram (+) bacteria or other pathogens, and activate different signaling pathways that generate transcriptional profiles to emphasize defense factors with greatest impact on the pathogens encountered (Ferrandon et al, 2007; Hoffmann and Reichart, 2002; Kraaijeveld et al, 2012). Moreover, previous encounters that result in immune elimination of pathogens lead to immune priming; fruit flies retain increased immune resistance to specific pathogens for about a week (Christofi and Apidianakis, 2013, Pham et al, 2007). Many of the authoritative papers in the field derived from studies of deuterostome invertebrates or of ecdysozoan protostomes, with studies of Lophotrochozoa, the other major branch of protostome invertebrates (Erwin et al, 2011), tending to lag behind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 Nevertheless, this long-lasting effect is not universal and needs to be evaluated individually for each microbial species. 182 Furthermore, flies infected with S. pneumoniae lose circadian rhythms several days before dying. 82 Consistently, flies lacking the central clock proteins timeless or period have higher sensitivity to S. pneumoniae but also to L. monocytogenes infection.…”
Section: Lessons From Drosophila Studies Of Human Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%