Drosophila as a Neurotoxicological Model

Lawal, Hakeem O.; Krantz, David E.

doi:10.1007/7653_2018_12

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 349 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The common fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is increasingly used as a model for developmental toxicology (Lawal & Krantz, 2018; Rand, 2010; Welch et al., 2022), in part due to its short life cycle and the ever‐expanding suite of inexpensive, quantitative behavioral paradigms, including assays that measure social behavior, grooming activity, locomotor behavior, circadian behavior, and learning and memory. A classic paradigm for studying learning and memory is courtship conditioning (Koemans et al., 2017; McBride, Holloway, & Jongens, 2012; Siegel & Hall, 1979), which involves exposing a male fruit fly to an unreceptive female that functions as an aversive stimulus by rejecting the male's courtship attempts during a training period.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Learning and Memory in Drosophila melanogaster to Study the Neurodevelopmental Impacts of Toxicants

Welch

Mulligan

2022

Current Protocols

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neurodevelopmental disorders are a heterogeneous group of behaviorally defined disorders with both genetic and environmental risk factors. Given that many neurodevelopmental disorders are characterized by impaired learning and/or intellectual abilities, behavioral paradigms that assess cognition in animal models have been effective tools in delineating underlying genetic variants that impact disease pathophysiology. For example, learning and memory paradigms in the common fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster have been successfully used to study risk genes and biological pathways associated with several neurodevelopmental disorders, including fragile X syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, and CHARGE syndrome. While these established Drosophila behavioral paradigms have historically been used to investigate genetic risk factors, they also have many other applications, including use in developmental neurotoxicology studies to determine environmental risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders. There is, however, a deficit of step‐by‐step protocols that describe how to apply learning and memory assays in fruit flies to developmental neurotoxicology studies. Here, we describe two quantitative behavioral paradigms for Drosophila—predator‐induced oviposition and courtship conditioning—that can be used to measure different forms of learning and memory in the context of a developmental neurotoxicology study. Non‐associative learning and memory are measured here by examining female Drosophila oviposition behavior in response to endoparasitoid wasps, while associative learning and memory are measured in males using courtship conditioning. Our protocols outline procedures for oral toxicant exposure of developing fruit flies, culturing of endoparasitoid wasps, measuring Drosophila oviposition activity, and assessing conditioned courtship in order to identify the impact of toxicants on learning and memory in both females and males. As an example, we present the protocols using bisphenol A, a chemical utilized in the synthesis of polycarbonate plastics, to determine its impacts on learning and memory. These protocols are inexpensive and relatively simple to perform, and can be used by labs that are new to Drosophila behavioral research to evaluate how toxicant exposure influences learning and memory in male and female flies. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of toxicant‐containing food and developmental exposure Basic Protocol 2: Predator‐induced oviposition assay Support Protocol: Culture of Leptopilina heterotoma Basic Protocol 3: Conditioned courtship assay

show abstract