2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Droplet digital PCR for large genomic rearrangements detection: A promising strategy in tissue BRCA1 testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1-6,8,10,12,19, 33 For this reason, it is important to use a method with sufficient sensitivity to detect ultra low-level mosaicism; and our study shows that ddPCR provides an optimal approach for this purpose. 12,14,15 When considering sample availability, it is very imperative to select the relevant tissue to efficiently identify mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1-6,8,10,12,19, 33 For this reason, it is important to use a method with sufficient sensitivity to detect ultra low-level mosaicism; and our study shows that ddPCR provides an optimal approach for this purpose. 12,14,15 When considering sample availability, it is very imperative to select the relevant tissue to efficiently identify mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Therefore, ddPCR has been increasingly used as a clinical diagnostic method to efficiently and reliably detect and quantify common cancerassociated variants (such as the common PIK3CA hotspot mutations -p.C420R, p.E542K, p.E545K, p.H1047L, and p.H1047R -for PIK3CA-related overgrowth disorders (PROS), and the BRAF V600E mutation for brain and thyroid tumors, among others), and has also been recently used in other pediatric overgrowth, vascular and lymphatic malformation phentypes. [12][13][14][15] The PI3K-AKT-MTOR-related developmental brain disorders, including most notably FCD and HMEG, have a narrow mutational spectrum, with a few "hotspot" mutations or variants representing a sizable portion of molecularly-solved cases. 4,6,9,10 Therefore, we tested these common mutations as a first tier molecular method to complement the neuroimaging and neuropathology diagnosis, in a large cohort of affected individuals to efficiently identify mutations and studying the relationship between levels of mosaicism and key neuroimaging and neuropathological features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our MGDUnit routinely assesses the BRCA molecular status using the amplicon-based library preparation kit Devyser BRCA (Devyser, Stockholm, Sweden) on Illumina MiSeq NGS platform [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the somatic bioinformatics pipeline must require computational algorithms developed ad hoc and specific characteristics of sequencing raw data (e.g. maximum amount, coverage uniformity and sufficient reads depth) 1 . Even if the majority of methods are optimized for somatic CNAs identification 6;8 , attention should be given in the comparison of blood and tissue tests results 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that only harmonized guidelines encompassing the abovementioned methodological and postanalytical steps could solve the BRCAgermline and somatic testing bias. In our laboratory, BRCAgenetic testing is routinely performed on blood, FFT and FFPE samples 1 . In many cases, we routinely analyze matched blood and tissue samples belonging from the same patient, in order to perform an efficient BRCA test comprehensive of both germline and somatic evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%