Drones, Surveillance, and Violence: Theory and Evidence from a US Drone Program

Abstract

We investigate the impact of the US drone program in Pakistan on insurgent violence. Using details about US-Pakistan counterterrorism cooperation and geocoded violence data, we show that the program was associated with monthly reductions of around nine to thirteen insurgent attacks and fifty-one to eighty-six casualties in the area affected by the program. This change was sizable, as in the year before the program, the affected area experienced around twenty-one attacks and one hundred casualties per month. Additional quantitative and qualitative evidence suggests that this drop is attributable to the drone program. However, the damage caused in strikes during the program cannot fully account for the reduction. Instead, anticipatory effects induced by the program played a prominent role in subduing violence. These effects stemmed from the insurgents’ perception of the risk of being targeted in drone strikes; their efforts to avoid targeting severely compromised their movement and communication abilities, in addition to eroding within-group trust. These findings contrast with prominent perspectives on air-power, counterinsurgency, and US counterterrorism, suggesting select drone deployments can be an effective tool of counterinsurgency and counterterrorism.

Possibilities and Restrictions on the Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Security Work in Latvia

“…A special program using UAs was set up to identify and neutralize rebels in Pakistan. Intelligence analysts, using data from long-term air surveillance and interception of communications, identified the insurgents, which made it quick to target them (Mir, Moore, 2019;Restrepo, 2019).…”

Violence without Borders: The Internationalization of Crime and Conflict

“…Where crime is concerned, Do, Ma, and Ruiz (2016) found that, although the deployment of international naval assets off the coast of Somalia did reduce pirate activity, a bigger factor was the presence of privately contracted armed security personnel on board the largest vessels. Studying the impact of US drone strikes in Pakistan, Mir and Moore (2018) found a significant reduction in insurgent violence attributable both to the loss of insurgent personnel and to the deterrent effects of perceived higher risk. Crucially, they found no evidence that the drone strikes resulted in greater support or recruitment by the Pakistan Taliban, which suggests that, in that context, the increased-grievances channel was not very strong.…”

Economic Migration and Communal Violence in Pakistan

“…The New America Foundation (NAF) has collected data on these strikes from major international, regional, and Western media outlets, tracking the date, location, and estimated casualties of each strike. Their tallies have been used extensively in public discussions about the program's efficacy, as well as academic studies like Johnston and Sarbahi (), Jaegar and Siddique (), and Mir and Moore ().…”