2018
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201712052191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving forces behind ecosystem spatial changes in the Yangtze River Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The diminished farming and grassland area was mostly converted into forest and agricultural land. Finally, the area of barren land and water did not change considerably, confirming prior findings [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The diminished farming and grassland area was mostly converted into forest and agricultural land. Finally, the area of barren land and water did not change considerably, confirming prior findings [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, several key differences have been observed from previous studies (Kong et al, 2018) and official statistics. For example, according to an assessment by the National Forestry and Grassland Administration in 2007, vegetation coverage in YRB increased by about 2% since the end of 2007 due to GTGP (Delang & Yuan, 2015), increased 3.5% during 1999-2014 due to GTGP (Wang et al, 2017), and approximately 2.1% growth since the end of 2015 (Kong et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results With Other Studiescontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, several key differences have been observed from previous studies (Kong et al, 2018) and official statistics. For example, according to an assessment by the National Forestry and Grassland Administration in 2007, vegetation coverage in YRB increased by about 2% since the end of 2007 due to GTGP (Delang & Yuan, 2015), increased 3.5% during 1999-2014 due to GTGP (Wang et al, 2017), and approximately 2.1% growth since the end of 2015 (Kong et al, 2018). In fact, the area of revegetation on the YRB is only about 1.74%, and the effectiveness of revegetation is only about 0.93%, which is less than the official statistics (~2%) (see Note: variance inflation factors (VIFs) were tested to be <2.5.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results With Other Studiescontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…As human activities intensified all over the world, HQ was under unprecedented pressure and required some protective measures [27,28]. Meanwhile, a great deal of methods and models, e.g., the habitat suitability index (HSI) [29,30], the ecosystem service value (ESV) [31,32], and the HQ model of InVEST, have been developed to assess HQ [33,34]. Among them, the HQ model, with simple operation and easy access to data, combined the sensitivity of different land use types with various threat factors and the external threat strength to obtain the distribution of HQ [35][36][37] that makes the results relatively accurate and visual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%