2013
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey

Abstract: Background/objectives To determine which aspects of primary care matter most to patients, we aim to identify those aspects of patient experience that show the strongest relationship with overall satisfaction and examine the extent to which these relationships vary by socio-demographic and health characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
113
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(44 reference statements)
5
113
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on findings of previous research, 11,13,14 including our work focused on help-seeking for cancer symptoms, 10,19 we chose five attributes of primary care consultations, namely:…”
Section: Attributes and Attribute Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on findings of previous research, 11,13,14 including our work focused on help-seeking for cancer symptoms, 10,19 we chose five attributes of primary care consultations, namely:…”
Section: Attributes and Attribute Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on patient-receptionist encounters are often reflective of, or responding to, the stereotype of receptionists as 'dragons' or as 'gatekeepers' that is prominent in media discourse. Some academic research supports this notion by highlighting receptionists' strong intermediary role in their everyday dealing with patients [8,9]. But most studies draw a more nuanced picture, suggesting that particular complexities and constraints in the receptionists' job affect their ability to facilitate patient access [3,6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hewitt et al's [7,11,12] work is, to the best of our knowledge, the only study of patient care that also analyses real-time interaction, but in faceto-face encounters rather than in initial telephone calls (see also [13,14]). The majority of quality-of-service studies within patient care are based on surveys, self-reports and/or focus groups [9,15]. The disadvantage of such methods is that they fail to explain how and when problems occur in encounters, and therefore we do not know what needs improving or how to improve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] There is limited understanding whether physicians can transform their communication and relationship behaviors, and how they can accomplish that. The purpose of this study was to find and share physician experiences of change, in their own words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%