Drivers and Barriers for Open Government Data Adoption: An Isomorphic Neo-Institutional Perspective

Roa, Henry N.; Loza-Aguirre, Edison; Flores, Pamela

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39445-5_43

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The unit of adoption can be influenced by the external arenas like a push from international organizations, regulatory agencies, peer organizations within and outside the same government or industry, higher-level authorities [21], or media and the public [46] to share the data online in open formats. The organizations are intended to achieve and obtain greater compliance with the legitimacy requirement within their institutional sphere [38,47]. Changes and improvements in organization processes can also take place through bottom-up influence like general public and public practitioners.…”

Section: Compliance Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

An Intention-Adoption Behavioral Model for Open Government Data in Pakistan’s Public Sector Organizations–An Exploratory Study

Khurshid¹,

Zakaria²,

Arfeen³

et al. 2020

Re-Imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

show abstract

Section: Compliance Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

An Intention-Adoption Behavioral Model for Open Government Data in Pakistan’s Public Sector Organizations–An Exploratory Study

Khurshid¹,

Zakaria²,

Arfeen³

et al. 2020

Re-Imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The adoption-studies we reviewed, were each conducted in the specific contexts of individual countries, including Switzerland (Estermann 2014), Australia (Hossain & Chan 2015), Taiwan (Yang et al 2015;Wang & Lo 2016;Yang & Wu 2016), Saudi Arabia (Altayar 2018), Malaysia (Haini et al 2019), and Ecuador (Roa et al 2020). They refer to specific levels of public administration, e.g., Haini et al (2019), to the local level of municipalities, Hossain and Chan (2015), and Wang and Lo, (2016), as well as, Yang and Wu (2016), to the level of federal agencies, and Estermann (2014), to cultural heritage institutions.…”

Section: Relevant Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Considering the Reluctance to Adopt Open Data in German Public Administration: An Exploration of Individual Innovation-Decisions

Elixmann¹,

Jarke²

2022

JeDEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines different forms of rejecting Open Data by administrative staff in German public administrations. The starting point for our study, was the observation that the diffusion of Open Data in Germany has been rather restrained in practice, despite potential advantages and strong political commitment. For this purpose, individual innovation-decision processes of administrative staff were examined. The paper is based on semi-structured interviews with experienced Open Data experts and provides insights into rejecting or negative attitudes as well as resistance to Open Data by administrative employees and thus, provides explanations for the reluctance such as perceived high risks associated with the implementation of Open Data. At the same time, experiences regarding barriers, like an insufficient technical framework for Open Data are presented. This provides important insights on how to address negative attitudes and opposition to Open Data effectively.

show abstract

“…In one large survey, 57% of respondents reported the lack of a mandate as a key reason why they don't share their research data (Nicholas et al, 2020), another recurring theme (e.g. Schmidt et al, 2016;Roa et al, 2020;Safavorv, 2020).…”

Section: Perceived Costs Versus Perceived Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most basic sense of culture is that sharing data is not a norm. Some studies identified a lack of positive examples (e.g Yang et al, 2020;Roa et al, 2020). Others directly indicated it wasn't the norm for their discipline (e.g.…”

Section: Culture (Organizational Norms)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This was seen as motivating in some studies (e.g. Bezuidenhout & Chakauya, 2018;Roa et al, 2020), which suggests a transition from the psychology of scarcity (hoarding, value is in the resource I hold) to the psychology of plenty (sharing, value is in how the resource connects me to others). It's unclear how to operationalize this mitigating factor.…”

Section: Mitigationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Individual Perspectives on Data Sharing: Human Factors Impacting the Digital Economy

Smit¹,

Larose²,

Falvey³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drivers and Barriers for Open Government Data Adoption: An Isomorphic Neo-Institutional Perspective

Cited by 5 publications

References 27 publications

An Intention-Adoption Behavioral Model for Open Government Data in Pakistan’s Public Sector Organizations–An Exploratory Study

An Intention-Adoption Behavioral Model for Open Government Data in Pakistan’s Public Sector Organizations–An Exploratory Study

Considering the Reluctance to Adopt Open Data in German Public Administration: An Exploration of Individual Innovation-Decisions

Individual Perspectives on Data Sharing: Human Factors Impacting the Digital Economy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About