2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iv48863.2021.9575431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver State and Behavior Detection Through Smart Wearables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Video and sensor data are integrated and used as heterogeneous data. For example, Tavakoli et al used heterogeneous data from in-car cameras and driver's wearable devices and used machine learning algorithms such as random forest to recognize driver activities such as using the phone, eating, crossing intersections, and highway driving [18]. Ranieri et al proposed an indoor action recognition method for the elderly using the RGB-D camera images captured by a humanoid robot, wearable inertial sensors, and surrounding sensors attached to items inside a home [19].…”
Section: Behavior Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video and sensor data are integrated and used as heterogeneous data. For example, Tavakoli et al used heterogeneous data from in-car cameras and driver's wearable devices and used machine learning algorithms such as random forest to recognize driver activities such as using the phone, eating, crossing intersections, and highway driving [18]. Ranieri et al proposed an indoor action recognition method for the elderly using the RGB-D camera images captured by a humanoid robot, wearable inertial sensors, and surrounding sensors attached to items inside a home [19].…”
Section: Behavior Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These [17], researchers used smartwatches to passively sense and classify driver activities, outside events, and road attributes. Analyzing data from 15 participants in a naturalistic driving study, they achieved impressive results with average F1 scores of 94.55%, 98.27%, and 97.86%, respectively, through 10-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key advantage of these techniques is that they may detect incidents instantaneously, allowing timely decisions to be made and damages to be minimized. Some examples of these techniques are: Vehicle Mounted Cameras [18], Smartphones Built-In Sensors [19,20], Specialized Hardware/Sensors [21], Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) [22], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%