Driver Acceptance of New Technology 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781315578132-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver Acceptance of In-Vehicle Information, Assistance and Automated Systems: An Overview

Abstract: This chapter provides an overview of Human Factors issues relevant to the acceptance by drivers of technology-based systems within vehicles. A distinction is made between issues relevant to systems providing information to support drivingrelated tasks (e.g. navigation), systems that provide some degree of control-based assistance (e.g. Adaptive Cruise Control) and those systems which automate the driving task (e.g. platooning). It is recognised that a range of Human Factors issues will have a direct influence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also "lock onto" an object in the adjacent lane while overtaking or in highly curved road segments, and the system does not perform well in heavy rain, snow of fog. Some system versions of the system also do not operate in velocities lower than 30 km/h, whereas others can bring the vehicle to a complete stop and accelerate again if the vehicle in front does (Burnett & Diels, 2014;Larsson, 2012;Sullivan et al, 2016). Similar problems also arise for systems relying on a good visibility and quality of road markings, such as LDW or Traffic Sign Recognition, which might not be fully functional if the sensors or the markings/signs themselves are covered with, for example, snow (Kozak et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also "lock onto" an object in the adjacent lane while overtaking or in highly curved road segments, and the system does not perform well in heavy rain, snow of fog. Some system versions of the system also do not operate in velocities lower than 30 km/h, whereas others can bring the vehicle to a complete stop and accelerate again if the vehicle in front does (Burnett & Diels, 2014;Larsson, 2012;Sullivan et al, 2016). Similar problems also arise for systems relying on a good visibility and quality of road markings, such as LDW or Traffic Sign Recognition, which might not be fully functional if the sensors or the markings/signs themselves are covered with, for example, snow (Kozak et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User acceptance and acceptability of in-vehicle information and assistance systems are essential for several reasons (Burnett & Diels, 2014). Firstly, systems must be accepted if they are then to be used (i.e.…”
Section: Information Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%