Proceedings of IADC/SPE Drilling Conference 2004
DOI: 10.2523/87169-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drilling Fluid affects MWD Magnetic Azimuth and Wellbore Position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shielding can cause azimuth errors of 1-2 degrees, and errors even five to ten times larger may occur for certain wellbore directions under unfavourable conditions (Wilson and Brooks 2001;Torkildsen et al 2004;Amundsen, Torkildsen, and Saasen 2006). Thus, magnetic contamination can reduce the borehole position accuracy sufficiently to reduce the probability of hitting the planned target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shielding can cause azimuth errors of 1-2 degrees, and errors even five to ten times larger may occur for certain wellbore directions under unfavourable conditions (Wilson and Brooks 2001;Torkildsen et al 2004;Amundsen, Torkildsen, and Saasen 2006). Thus, magnetic contamination can reduce the borehole position accuracy sufficiently to reduce the probability of hitting the planned target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The magnetic properties of a drilling fluid is known to depend on such variables as the mineralogical composition of the weight material used (Jiles 1991), contamination of magnetic elements (such as steel) due to mechanical wear of downhole and surface equipment (Shook and Roco 1991;Wilson et al 2006), and the circulation properties of the drilling fluid (Torkildsen et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tool combines three-axis gyroscopes and three-axis magnetometers to provide the attitude (tool face, inclination, and azimuth) of the drill bit. However, the performance of the MWD tools would deteriorate under the strong magnetic interference caused by the following factors: (1) flow of currents in the atmosphere and moving of solar wind [ 5 ]; (2) existing drilling fluid and debris [ 6 , 7 ]; (3) ferromagnetic deposits in the proximity of bottom hole assembly (BHA) [ 8 ]. Non-magnetic drill collars can effectively eliminate the magnetic disturbance; however, the high cost, high weight, and weak fracture drill collars fail to be widely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shielding can cause azimuth errors of 1° -2°, and even larger errors may occur for certain wellbore directions under unfavourable conditions (Wilson and Brooks, 2001;Torkildsen et al, 2004;Amundsen et al, 2005;Amundsen et al, 2006;). This shielding can cause azimuth errors of 1° -2°, and even larger errors may occur for certain wellbore directions under unfavourable conditions (Wilson and Brooks, 2001;Torkildsen et al, 2004;Amundsen et al, 2005;Amundsen et al, 2006;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was performed to examine the attenuation of magnetic fields in a wellbore fully or partially filled with magnetically contaminated drilling fluid, and with MWD directional sensors placed inside a tool located at a given position in the wellbore. Torkildsen et al (2004) presented results from two independent methods for measuring magnetic susceptibility of drilling fluids. The phenomenon was demonstrated in several ways, both by laboratory experiments and analyses of magnetic directional survey data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%