1950
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.3.2.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dried Disc Technique for Determining Sensitivity to the Antibiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Oxford cup method was still used in Norway early in the 1960s, but the two dominating methods were the tablet method and the paper disk method (Steen 1955). Paper disks had first been employed for assays of penicillin during World War II (Vincent and Vincent 1944), but the method was quickly adapted to the antibiotic susceptibility test (Thompson 1950). 4…”
Section: Sensitivity Testing: “A Necessary Evil”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Oxford cup method was still used in Norway early in the 1960s, but the two dominating methods were the tablet method and the paper disk method (Steen 1955). Paper disks had first been employed for assays of penicillin during World War II (Vincent and Vincent 1944), but the method was quickly adapted to the antibiotic susceptibility test (Thompson 1950). 4…”
Section: Sensitivity Testing: “A Necessary Evil”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the outset filter paper strip methods were employed. During the course of time, however, this practice was abandoned in favour of the dried filter paper disc technique (Thompson, 1950;Fairbrother, Martyn, and Parker, 1951). When standard antibiotic test tablets (Evans's " sentests ") became available for most of the commoner drugs these were substituted for filter paper discs, since it was found that far more consistent and reliable results were thus obtained.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Belgrave Hospital all the organisms isolated in the early cases were tested for chloramphenicol sensitivity by the disk method of Thompson (1950). This was soon abandoned, however, because in two cases a Proteus vulgaris isolated from each, which was apparently non-sensitive by the disk titration, vanished within 48 hours of treatment with the chloramphenicol solution.…”
Section: Bacteriologymentioning
confidence: 99%