1994
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1994.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drainage Investment and Wetlands Loss: an Analysis of the National Resources Inventory Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). The temporal changes in bird species composition indicate that the drying and draining of wetlands negatively affect biodiversity, a finding that is in line with patterns observed in other wetlands globally (Douglas & Johnson ; Gerakis & Kalburtji ; Smith & Chow‐Fraser ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…). The temporal changes in bird species composition indicate that the drying and draining of wetlands negatively affect biodiversity, a finding that is in line with patterns observed in other wetlands globally (Douglas & Johnson ; Gerakis & Kalburtji ; Smith & Chow‐Fraser ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Likewise, wetlands in cultivated fields or pastures were expected to have higher impact rates than wetlands located in idle grasslands or wooded areas. Finally, we expected jurisdictional differences in rates and incidence of impact to wetlands due to provincial differences in agricultural and wetland protection policies as well as other socioeconomic drivers (Douglas andJohnson 1994, Bradshaw andSmit 1997).…”
Section: Hypotheses and Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuating commodity prices for agricultural products and agricultural subsidies may influence rates of wetland impact (Bradshaw andSmit 1997, Drever et al 2007). Wetland size and distance to roads could also influence impact and recovery (Douglas andJohnson 1994, Daniels andCumming 2008). These factors could be considered as covariates in future analyses.…”
Section: Implications For Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If land-use policy and planning are to be efficient in conserving wetland habitats, it is imperative to identify, in a geographically explicit fashion, those areas where the risks of future wetland habitat conversion are highest. Recent efforts to develop predictive models of wetland conversion have considered physical and socioeconomic variables (Douglas and Johnson 1994) and suites of environmental variables that reflect wetland type, soil and topographic conditions, landuse and land-cover characteristics, and the spatial proximity of roads and cities (Koneff andRoyle 2004, Daniels andCumming 2008). Variation in wetland loss rates at the spatial extent of states in the USA was associated strongly with three variables: land drained (drainage investment), wetland rural acreage, and farmland realty value (Douglas and Johnson 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts to develop predictive models of wetland conversion have considered physical and socioeconomic variables (Douglas and Johnson 1994) and suites of environmental variables that reflect wetland type, soil and topographic conditions, landuse and land-cover characteristics, and the spatial proximity of roads and cities (Koneff andRoyle 2004, Daniels andCumming 2008). Variation in wetland loss rates at the spatial extent of states in the USA was associated strongly with three variables: land drained (drainage investment), wetland rural acreage, and farmland realty value (Douglas and Johnson 1994). Elevation and a wetness index (derived from slope and location in a watershed) were important predictors of wetland occurrence in Atlantic Coast states (Koneff and Royle 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%