2015
DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draft genome sequences of Ceratocystis eucalypticola, Chrysoporthe cubensis, C. deuterocubensis, Davidsoniella virescens, Fusarium temperatum, Graphilbum fragrans, Penicillium nordicum, and Thielaviopsis musarum

Abstract: The genomes of Ceratocystis eucalypticola, Chrysoporthe cubensis, Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis, Davidsoniella virescens, Fusarium temperatum, Graphilbum fragrans, Penicillium nordicum and Thielaviopsis musarum are presented in this genome announcement. These seven genomes are from plant pathogens and otherwise economically important fungal species. The genome sizes range from 28 Mb in the case of T. musarum to 45 Mb for Fusarium temperatum. These genomes include the first reports of genomes for the genera Davi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
73
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
7
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genome annotation produced a broad range in the number of annotated proteins within the Ophiostomatales (Table ). We annotated previously sequenced (but not annotated) genomes from Graphilbum fragrans (8,878 protein coding genes) (Wingfield et al., ), L. procerum (8,430 protein coding genes) (van der Nest et al., ) and O. novo‐ulmi (8,314 protein coding genes) (Forgetta et al., ). Strain information and accession numbers for the corresponding sequencing projects are given for each annotated genome in Table Protein and transcript FASTA files as well as gff3 files containing functional annotation are available at Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tk569.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome annotation produced a broad range in the number of annotated proteins within the Ophiostomatales (Table ). We annotated previously sequenced (but not annotated) genomes from Graphilbum fragrans (8,878 protein coding genes) (Wingfield et al., ), L. procerum (8,430 protein coding genes) (van der Nest et al., ) and O. novo‐ulmi (8,314 protein coding genes) (Forgetta et al., ). Strain information and accession numbers for the corresponding sequencing projects are given for each annotated genome in Table Protein and transcript FASTA files as well as gff3 files containing functional annotation are available at Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tk569.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of these genome statistics revealed no striking differences between the genome of C. fagacearum and those determined in previous studies (Wilken et al 2013, van der Nest et al 2014a, b, Wingfield et al 2015a, b, 2016, Belbahri 2015). This is despite its unique ecology and taxonomic position (de Beer et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The data are thus intended to compliment the previously established genome resources for species in the Ceratocystidaceae (Wilken et al 2013, van der Nest et al 2014a, b, Wingfield et al 2015a, b, Belbahri 2015, Wingfield et al 2016), particularly in order to draw comparisons between them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sequenced species in Diaporthales (one genome per species for 12 species) were used. These species include: Cryphonectria parasitica (jgi.doe.gov), Chrysoporthe cubensis [14], Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis [14], Chrysoporthe austroafricana [15], Valsa mali [12], Valsa pyri [12], Diaporthe ampelina [16], Diaporthe aspalathi [17], Diaporthe longicolla [18], Diaporthe helianthi [19], and Melanconium sp. The outgroups used were Neurospora crassa [20] and Magnaporthe grisea [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%