2017
DOI: 10.4135/9781529704587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dr. Lal PathLabs (B)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-expression of the HopE1-HA CaM-binding site mutants did not alter MAP65-1-GFP microtubule localization and did not significantly reduce the MAP65-1-GFP signal ( Figures 4A-4C and S4A). To determine if HopE1 has a more general effect on the microtubule network, we crossed the transgenic HopE1-expressing plants with plants that expressed MAP4-GFP, TUB6-GFP, TUA6-GFP, or EB1-GFP, other proteins associated with the microtubule network (Marc et al, 1998;Mathur et al, 2003;Nakamura et al, 2004;Takemoto et al, 2003). In contrast to MAP65-1-GFP, HopE1-HA had no effect on the fluorescence signal emanating from these GFP fusions ( Figures S4B-S4I).…”
Section: Hope1 Binds To Map65 In a Cam-dependent Mannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-expression of the HopE1-HA CaM-binding site mutants did not alter MAP65-1-GFP microtubule localization and did not significantly reduce the MAP65-1-GFP signal ( Figures 4A-4C and S4A). To determine if HopE1 has a more general effect on the microtubule network, we crossed the transgenic HopE1-expressing plants with plants that expressed MAP4-GFP, TUB6-GFP, TUA6-GFP, or EB1-GFP, other proteins associated with the microtubule network (Marc et al, 1998;Mathur et al, 2003;Nakamura et al, 2004;Takemoto et al, 2003). In contrast to MAP65-1-GFP, HopE1-HA had no effect on the fluorescence signal emanating from these GFP fusions ( Figures S4B-S4I).…”
Section: Hope1 Binds To Map65 In a Cam-dependent Mannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research work in the authors' laboratories has been extended to the use of the much cheaper carbon feedstocks for the production of carbon nanotube and graphene. This included the use of Jatropha oil [56], bituminous coal, super clean coal [57], Pongamia and palm oil [58], waste plastics [59], and presently even CO 2. The CNTs obtained were characterized and these were used for the production of nanocomposites by using polystyrene which showed interesting electrical and thermal properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%