1998
DOI: 10.1038/28810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doubling the critical temperature of La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 using epitaxial strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
412
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 623 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
22
412
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation is that LSCO films on SLAO have a larger c-axis lattice parameter and hence also a larger copper to apical-oxygen distance than what is found in bulk crystals [44,45]. As a consequence, the d z 2 states are less relevant and hence lead to a less pronounced zone-boundary dispersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A possible explanation is that LSCO films on SLAO have a larger c-axis lattice parameter and hence also a larger copper to apical-oxygen distance than what is found in bulk crystals [44,45]. As a consequence, the d z 2 states are less relevant and hence lead to a less pronounced zone-boundary dispersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent examples of such strain-functionality coupling include the control of metal-to-insulator transition temperature in VO2 5 and the insulator-tosuperconductor transition temperature in La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 6 . Going beyond the ability to effectively manipulate already existing physical properties of a given material, strain has also been shown to invoke entirely new exotic ground states such as ferroelectricity in SrTiO3 and increased ferroelectric polarization in BaTiO3, consistent with theoretical predictions [7][8][9] .…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has raised the importance of the structural topology for controlling the T c max in these materials. Indeed, recently it has been argued that electronic inhomogeneity controlled by organization of defects, lattice distortions, interface states, nanoscale phase separation in the layered oxides has substantial influence in the superconducting properties of cuprates [4][5][6][7][8][9]. This appears to be common to all layered superconductors as diborides [10][11][12][13] and more recently pnictides [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%