1961
DOI: 10.1266/jjg.36.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doubling Dose for Polygenic Mutations in <i>Drosophila</i> <i>melanogaster</i>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
1

Year Published

1964
1964
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Robertson (1955) considered that most genes affecting abdominal bristle number had no direct effect on reproductive fitness. Yamada and Kitagawa (1961) and Tobari and Nei (1965) agreed, because X-irradiation increased the phenotypic variance of abdominal bristle number, but had no effect on the mean. Perhaps of more relevance to our results is the study of Latter (1963) on abdominal bristle number in this same Canberra population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Robertson (1955) considered that most genes affecting abdominal bristle number had no direct effect on reproductive fitness. Yamada and Kitagawa (1961) and Tobari and Nei (1965) agreed, because X-irradiation increased the phenotypic variance of abdominal bristle number, but had no effect on the mean. Perhaps of more relevance to our results is the study of Latter (1963) on abdominal bristle number in this same Canberra population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Taking the average increment in variance per genome, per generation due to spontaneous mutation as 0.00475, which is an average of the value for abdominal bristles reported by Clayton and Robertson (1955) and Paxman (1957), the doubling dose calculated from the results of the present experiment, when both sexes were irradiated, is 16R (Table 3). Yamada and Kitagawa (1961) Recently two papers were published in which these authors estimated the increase in variance per roentgen (Calayton and Robertson, 1964;Tobari and Nei, 1965). Estimates in the former report were much lower than ours, but the latter reported results which were slightly higher than those obtained in this experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main result of this work has already published in Yamada and Kitagawa (1961). The details of the selection experiments after irradiation is presented in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There is some experimental evidence that the amount of new genetic variance produced by mutation each generation is roughly constant independent of the background level of genetic variance. The data of Scossiroli & Scossiroli (1959), Yamada & Kitagawa (1961) and Clayton & Robertson (1964) show that the genetic variance produced in quantitative characters of Drosophila by a given dose of X-rays is approximately the same in lines with low and high heterozygosity. No other evidence bearing on this point was found.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%