1975
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300016037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci

Abstract: It is assumed that a character under stabilizing selection is determined genetically by n linked, mutable loci with additive effects and a range of many possible allelic effects at each locus. A general qualitative feature of such systems is that the genetic variance for the character is independent of the linkage map of the loci, provided linkage is not very tight. A particular detailed model shows that certain aspects of the genetic system are moulded by stabilizing selection while others are selectively neu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
265
1
3

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 736 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
265
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ectotherm and endotherm data are from this study and are based upon the median by trait data set. The Drosophila data are derived from Roff and Mousseau (1987) and is based upon the median by study data set There are many factors which may be responsible for the maintenance of genetic variance of fitness characters, The rate of origin of variation by mutation alone may be sufficient to maintain substantial additive genetic variance within natural populations (Lande, 1976;Turelli, 1984). Heterozygote advantage (Falconer, 1981), frequency dependent selection (Bulmer, 1980), variable selection in heterogeneous environments (Ewing, 1979), diversifying selection (Thoday, 1972), and migration (Felsenstein, 1976) have been proposed as possible mechanisms for the sustenance of genetic variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ectotherm and endotherm data are from this study and are based upon the median by trait data set. The Drosophila data are derived from Roff and Mousseau (1987) and is based upon the median by study data set There are many factors which may be responsible for the maintenance of genetic variance of fitness characters, The rate of origin of variation by mutation alone may be sufficient to maintain substantial additive genetic variance within natural populations (Lande, 1976;Turelli, 1984). Heterozygote advantage (Falconer, 1981), frequency dependent selection (Bulmer, 1980), variable selection in heterogeneous environments (Ewing, 1979), diversifying selection (Thoday, 1972), and migration (Felsenstein, 1976) have been proposed as possible mechanisms for the sustenance of genetic variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these data are rather few and derived primarily from domestic animals, which may be partly inbred. Extension to wild, outbred organisms may be erroneous.It is possible that some significant amount of additive genetic variance can be maintained within natural populations, even for characters tightly connected to fitness; possible mechanisms include mutation (Lande, 1976; Turelli, 1984), heterozygote advantage (Falconer, 1981), frequency dependence (Bulmer, 1980), fluctuating environments (Ewing, 1979) and migration (Felsenstein, 1976). In addition, zero additive genetic variance in fitness is consistent with positive heritability estimates of fitness components when there exists negative genetic correlations between components (Rose and Charlesworth, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two perspectives on the evolutionary stability of the G matrix provide contrasting views on treating G as a constant over evolutionary time, a proposition first suggested by Lande (1975Lande ( , 1979Lande ( , 1980a. According to one perspective, G may fluctuate erratically through time, reflecting change in underlying gene frequencies (Turelli 1988;Shaw et al 1995;Roff 2000) or in genes of major effect (Agrawal et al 2001).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, mutationselection models 12 and the neutral theory of evolution 13 indicate that the strength of stabilizing selection is an important determinant of standing levels of variation. All else being equal, weaker stabilizing selection is expected to maintain higher levels of variation than stronger stabilizing selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%