2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(01)01262-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Double superconducting transition” in YBCO thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only plausible explanation for the multi-step characteristics of the superconducting transition is that there exists different macroscopic regions in each film exhibiting small differences with respect to composition, 24 causing different transition temperatures as well as a widening of the superconducting transition. It is also possible that grain boundaries in the film degrade with time, causing poor superconducting connections between grains, and in the end a non-percolative superconducting system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only plausible explanation for the multi-step characteristics of the superconducting transition is that there exists different macroscopic regions in each film exhibiting small differences with respect to composition, 24 causing different transition temperatures as well as a widening of the superconducting transition. It is also possible that grain boundaries in the film degrade with time, causing poor superconducting connections between grains, and in the end a non-percolative superconducting system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present investigation is inspired by the recent experimental results obtained by Festin et al [6] for a 1500Å thin YBCO film: A very striking double peak structure in Re[ωσ(ω)] is found; two rapid drops of Im[−ωσ(ω)] at different T are observed. The data by Festin et al are reproduced in Figs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…One possible reason for the phase separation may lie in a combination of an inhomogeneous surface with a more homogeneous part closer to the substrate. This can lead to different oxygen contents in the two parts, which in turn results in slightly different lattice parameters causing a physical boundary between the two parts [6,[12][13][14] A further consistency check on the scenario in terms of two coupled 2D superconducting parts comes from the peak ratio defined as the ratio Re[ωσ(ω)]/Im[−ωσ(ω)] taken at the dissipation peak maxima for a given ω. For a 2D superconductor this peak ratio should vary between 2/π ≈ 0.63 for small ω to 1 for larger ω [15].…”
Section: And the Simulations Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations