2017
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Monoclonal Immunoassay for Quantifying Human Visinin-Like Protein-1 in CSF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau, and p‐tau were measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay using a fully automated platform (LUMIPULSE G1200, Fujirebio, Malvern, PA) according to manufacturer's specifications. Ng, SNAP‐25, and VILIP‐1 were measured with microparticle‐based immunoassays using Single Molecule Counting technology employing antibodies developed in the laboratory of Dr. Jack Ladenson at Washington University in St. Louis, as described previously 8,10,23 . Concentrations of sTREM2 were measured via an in‐house enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau, and p‐tau were measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay using a fully automated platform (LUMIPULSE G1200, Fujirebio, Malvern, PA) according to manufacturer's specifications. Ng, SNAP‐25, and VILIP‐1 were measured with microparticle‐based immunoassays using Single Molecule Counting technology employing antibodies developed in the laboratory of Dr. Jack Ladenson at Washington University in St. Louis, as described previously 8,10,23 . Concentrations of sTREM2 were measured via an in‐house enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fujirebio kit‐provided controls and in‐house fluid biomarker core CSF controls were used for quality control purposes (see supplemental materials for assay measurement range and quality control performance in Tables S6, S7, S8, and S9). VILIP‐1, SNAP‐25, and Ng were measured by quantitative fluorescent two‐site immunoassays with Single Molecule Counting (SMC) technology using antibodies and protocols developed in the laboratory of Dr. Jack Ladenson at Washington University in St. Louis, as was previously described 14,19–21 . Samples and in‐house CSF controls (Tables S10 and S11) were analyzed over 7 days, 27 samples per day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VILIP-1, SNAP-25, and Ng were measured by quantitative fluorescent two-site immunoassays with Single Molecule Counting (SMC) technology using antibodies and protocols developed in the laboratory of Dr. Jack Ladenson at Washington University in St. Louis, as was previously described. 14,[19][20][21] Samples and in-house CSF controls (Tables S10 and S11) were analyzed over 7 days, 27 samples per day.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of CSF Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau, and total p‐tau (181) were measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay using an automated platform (LUMIPULSE G1200, Fujirebio) according to the manufacturer's specifications. CSF Neurogranin, SNAP‐25, and VILIP‐1 were measured with microparticle‐based immunoassays using Single Molecule Counting technology 17,35,36 . CSF YKL‐40 (Quidel) was measured via commercial enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) according to manufacturer's recommendations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 CSF (10 Counting technology. 17,35,36 CSF YKL-40 (Quidel) was measured via commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) according to manufacturer's recommendations. CSF p-tau extracts were analyzed by nanoLC-MS/HRMS using Parallel Reaction Monitoring using higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation.…”
Section: Csf Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%