1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(97)81915-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-flow behavior observed in well tests of an extremely heterogeneous mine-spoil aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the hydraulic nature of fluid‐flow systems that develop in coal‐mine spoil is heterogeneous due to the bimodal size distribution of spoil sediments. Double‐porosity characteristics, flow‐through conduit‐like networks, and linear‐flow characteristics have been observed and documented in such flow systems (Maher and Donovan, 1997; Hawkins, 2004). In field trials, the vagaries of different fluid flow‐path networks may cause differences in leaching intensity to be observed between spoil piles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is well known that the hydraulic nature of fluid‐flow systems that develop in coal‐mine spoil is heterogeneous due to the bimodal size distribution of spoil sediments. Double‐porosity characteristics, flow‐through conduit‐like networks, and linear‐flow characteristics have been observed and documented in such flow systems (Maher and Donovan, 1997; Hawkins, 2004). In field trials, the vagaries of different fluid flow‐path networks may cause differences in leaching intensity to be observed between spoil piles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mean hydraulic properties along such channels or fractures may be significantly higher than the rest of the porous medium. In a more recent paper, Maher and Donovan [20] investigated the relationship between extreme heterogeneity and hydraulic test results in a mine-spoil aquifer created by backfilling the excavations during surface mining. They have observed three different drawdown response types during the tests: conventional, rapid response and ''double'' response.…”
Section: Observed Flow Responses In the Boreholesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slug tests are widely used by hydrologists to evaluate hydraulic conductivities of aquifer horizons. Although they are frequently used to evaluate water conductivities of aquifers, soils and minewaste areas created in surface mining [17][18][19][20], their use in longwall overburden is limited. The use of slug tests in active GGVs to measure the transient changes in hydraulic conductivities as a function of time and face location is currently non-existent in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmissivity of the aquifer is generally high but also highly heterogeneous, with the likelihood of numerous preferred-flow pathways (e.g. Hawkins and Aljoe 1992;Maher and Donovan 1997). The dip magnitude and dip direction of the pit floor is thought to have a substantial influence of ground water flow direction and velocity.…”
Section: Aquifer Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%