1983
DOI: 10.1177/014107688307600605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-ended Pigtail Polyethylene Stents in Management of Benign and Malignant Ureteric Obstruction

Abstract: Surgical urinary diversion for incurable pelvic malignancy has a high morbidity and mortality, and external drainage provides less than ideal palliation. Six patients with ureteric obstruction caused by cancer have been managed by operative or endoscopic insertion of self-retaining polyethylene tubes. These techniques also have applications in non-malignant disease, and the treatment of two patients with benign ureteric stricture is described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of double J stents is now routine in urological practice, the main indications being benign and malignant strictures, obstruction due to stones, ureteric injury, prophylaxis following surgery and acute hydronephrosis of pregnancy (Finney, 1978; Read at the Combined Meeting of the British Association of Urological Surgeons and the Canadian Urological Association in London, June 1986 _ --_ _ _ _~~ Lang et al, 1979;Mardis et al, 1982;Ball et al, 1983;Jones et al, 1983;Laverson et al, 1984;Lang, 1984;Andriole et al, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of double J stents is now routine in urological practice, the main indications being benign and malignant strictures, obstruction due to stones, ureteric injury, prophylaxis following surgery and acute hydronephrosis of pregnancy (Finney, 1978; Read at the Combined Meeting of the British Association of Urological Surgeons and the Canadian Urological Association in London, June 1986 _ --_ _ _ _~~ Lang et al, 1979;Mardis et al, 1982;Ball et al, 1983;Jones et al, 1983;Laverson et al, 1984;Lang, 1984;Andriole et al, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%