1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00112.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-Blind Tests of Subliminal Self-Help Audiotapes

Abstract: Three replications of a doirble-blind experiment tested siibliminal airdiotape products that were claimed to itnprove memory or to increase selfesteem. Conditions of use adhered to tnatiirfacturers' recommettdariotis, arid subjects (N = 237) were limited to persons who desired the effects offered by the tapes. Actual content arid labeled content of tapes were itidepetidetitly varied, so that some siibjects who believed they were using memory tapes were actirally using self-esteem tapes, and vice versa. After a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, any improvements in self-control in the trained group may be attributable to Hawthorne effects, placebo effects, or demand characteristics (see Shipstead, Redick, & Engle, 2012, for similar criticisms of studies training executive function). This problem is compounded when self-control performance is assessed using subjective measures that are especially susceptible to such influences (Greenwald, Spangenberg, Pratkanis, & Eskenazi, 1991;Shipstead et al, 2012), and when adherence to the training task is not assessed, which makes it difficult to confirm that completion of the training task is responsible for any observed improvements in the trained group. Although most previous studies asked participants to keep records of task performance, the methods used may not have reliably assessed adherence (e.g., paper diaries submitted after training; see Table 1), and rates of adherence generally were not reported, presumably because these records were designed more to motivate adherence than to measure it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, any improvements in self-control in the trained group may be attributable to Hawthorne effects, placebo effects, or demand characteristics (see Shipstead, Redick, & Engle, 2012, for similar criticisms of studies training executive function). This problem is compounded when self-control performance is assessed using subjective measures that are especially susceptible to such influences (Greenwald, Spangenberg, Pratkanis, & Eskenazi, 1991;Shipstead et al, 2012), and when adherence to the training task is not assessed, which makes it difficult to confirm that completion of the training task is responsible for any observed improvements in the trained group. Although most previous studies asked participants to keep records of task performance, the methods used may not have reliably assessed adherence (e.g., paper diaries submitted after training; see Table 1), and rates of adherence generally were not reported, presumably because these records were designed more to motivate adherence than to measure it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audiotapes appear to be the most popular subliminal approach (Merikle and Skanes, 1992 (Auday, Mellett, and Williams, 1991;Greenwald, Spangenberg, Pratkanis, and Eskenazi, 1991;Merikle and Skanes, 1992;Russell, Rowe, and Smouse, 1991).…”
Section: Subliminal Self-help Productsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, Nick Epley of Cornell University, a leading researcher in the area of subliminal persuasion, concludes simply that "the resulting body of work…has produced far from impressive results…." Similarly, research evaluations of audio material with subliminally embedded messages (such as those promoting self-esteem or weight loss) have shown that they produce no effects beyond what people expect to experience (Greenwald, Spangenberg, Pratkanis, and Eskenazi, 1991;Pratkanis, 1992). Eight years later, another review (Moore and Pratkanis, 2000) reported that "recent scientifi c evidence continues to support our original appraisal that actions, motives, and beliefs are NOT susceptible to manipulation through the use of briefl y (i.e., subliminally) presented messages or directives.…”
Section: Subliminal Persuasionmentioning
confidence: 99%