2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-antibody sandwich ELISA using biotinylated antibodies for the detection of Echinococcus granulosus coproantigens in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The sensitivity of our test was higher than previously reported copro-ELISAs that used polyclonal antibodies. 13,[24][25][26] Two false-negative samples were observed in the present study; however, one of these had only one parasite, whereas the other was sampled at 20 days postinfection with E. granulosus. The parasite burden and the postinfection time may have affected detection due to fewer parasitic antigens being produced by a lower number of worms 29 or due to the antigen presentation of immature worms in early infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 The sensitivity of our test was higher than previously reported copro-ELISAs that used polyclonal antibodies. 13,[24][25][26] Two false-negative samples were observed in the present study; however, one of these had only one parasite, whereas the other was sampled at 20 days postinfection with E. granulosus. The parasite burden and the postinfection time may have affected detection due to fewer parasitic antigens being produced by a lower number of worms 29 or due to the antigen presentation of immature worms in early infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Few copro-ELISA tests based on the detection of somatic, excretory, or secretory antigens of E. granulosus have been developed with variable sensitivity and specificity. [24][25][26][27] All of these tests have a higher sensitivity than arecoline purgation and PCR for the detection of prepatent infection in dogs. 28 The sensitivity of our test was higher than previously reported copro-ELISAs that used polyclonal antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machnicka et al, 2003) or primarily for E. granulosus (Buishi et al, 2005a). For canine echinococcosis due to E. granulosus most authors report reasonable sensitivity (78.4 -100% (Allan et al, 1992;Benito and Carmena, 2005;Buishi et al, 2005a) and good genus specificity from 85 to greater than 95% (Allan et al, 1992;Benito and Carmena, 2005;Buishi et al, 2005a), as well as a degree of pre-patent detection (Deplazes et al, 1992;Jenkins et al, 2000). Where cross-reactions occur these generally appear to be caused by infection with Taenia hydatigena, the most common taeniid of dogs, and attempts to improve specificity by using monoclonal antibodies in coproELISAs have not been able to eliminate this problem (Malgor et al, 1997;Morel et al, 2013) (Table 1).…”
Section: Coproantigen Elisa For Detection Of Canine Echinococcosismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To create polyclonal antibodies against Echinococcus spp., rabbits were hyperimmunised with Echinococcus antigens, such as adult or protoscolex ES extracts (e.g. Benito and Carmena, 2005), or somatic extracts of adult tapeworms (e.g. Allan et al, 1992).…”
Section: Coproantigen Elisa For Detection Of Canine Echinococcosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…infection have been developed (Deplazes and Eckert, 1996;Benito and Carmena, 2005;Benito et al, 2006;Huang et al, 2007). The CoproAg-ELISA used was developed to detect adult infections of E. multilocularis (Sakashita et al, 1995) and E. granulosus (Malgor et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%