2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOT-1.1-dependent H3K79 methylation promotes normal meiotic progression and meiotic checkpoint function in C. elegans

Abstract: Epigenetic modifiers are emerging as important regulators of the genome. However, how they regulate specific processes during meiosis is not well understood. Methylation of H3K79 by the histone methyltransferase Dot1 has been shown to be involved in the maintenance of genomic stability in various organisms. In S. cerevisiae, Dot1 modulates the meiotic checkpoint response triggered by synapsis and/or recombination defects by promoting Hop1-dependent Mek1 activation and Hop1 distribution along unsynapsed meiotic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(156 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, worm PCH-2 is also required for the meiotic checkpoint induced in the synapsis-defective syp-1 mutant [72]. In this scenario, PCH-2 does not localize to chromosomes, opening the possibility that the diffuse extranuclear PCH-2 signal observed in syp-1 [73,74], analogous to the cytoplasmic distribution of budding yeast Pch2 characterized here, may be relevant for the checkpoint in worms.…”
Section: Nucleocytoplasmic Communication Underlies Meiotic Checkpoint Functionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, worm PCH-2 is also required for the meiotic checkpoint induced in the synapsis-defective syp-1 mutant [72]. In this scenario, PCH-2 does not localize to chromosomes, opening the possibility that the diffuse extranuclear PCH-2 signal observed in syp-1 [73,74], analogous to the cytoplasmic distribution of budding yeast Pch2 characterized here, may be relevant for the checkpoint in worms.…”
Section: Nucleocytoplasmic Communication Underlies Meiotic Checkpoint Functionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, worm PCH-2 is also required for the meiotic checkpoint induced in the synapsis-defective syp-1 mutant (Bhalla and Dernburg, 2005). In this scenario, PCH-2 does not localize to chromosomes, opening the possibility that the diffuse extranuclear PCH-2 signal observed in syp-1 (Deshong et al, 2014;Lascarez-Lagunas et al, 2020b), analogous to the cytoplasmic distribution of budding yeast Pch2 characterized here, may be relevant for the checkpoint in worms.…”
Section: Nucleocytoplasmic Communication Underlies Meiotic Checkpoint Functionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, in Drosophila melanogaster , Sir2 is linked to Pch2 function in meiosis (Joyce and McKim 2010 ), and it will be interesting to carefully examine the possible association of Pch2 with nucleolar regions in species other than budding yeast. In relation to this, a recent study in C. elegans revealed a role for Dot1 in checkpoint control (Lascarez-Lagunas et al 2020 ), as in budding yeast (San-Segundo and Roeder 1999 , 2000 ). However, there is currently no evidence that this function is directly connected to Pch2 localization to chromosomes (or the rDNA/nucleolus) (Lascarez-Lagunas et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Meiosismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In relation to this, a recent study in C. elegans revealed a role for Dot1 in checkpoint control (Lascarez-Lagunas et al 2020 ), as in budding yeast (San-Segundo and Roeder 1999 , 2000 ). However, there is currently no evidence that this function is directly connected to Pch2 localization to chromosomes (or the rDNA/nucleolus) (Lascarez-Lagunas et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Meiosismentioning
confidence: 94%