Dosimetric properties of a beam quality‐matched 6 MV unflattened photon beam

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report the characteristics of an equivalent quality unflattened (eqUF) photon beam in clinical implementation and to provide a generalized method to describe unflattened (UF) photon beam profiles. An unflattened photon beam with a beam quality equivalent to the corresponding flat 6 MV photon beam (WF) was obtained by removing the flattening filter from a Siemens ONCOR Avant‐Garde linear accelerator and adjusting the photon energy. A method independent from the WF beam profile was presented to describe UF beam profiles and other selected beam characteristics were examined. The short‐term beam stability was examined by dynamic beam profiles, recorded every 0.072 s in static and gated delivery, and the long‐term stability was evidenced by the five‐year clinical quality assurance records. The dose rate was raised fivefold using the eqUF beam. The depth of maximum dose (normaldmax) shifted 3 mm deeper, but the percent depth dose beyond dmax was very similar to that of the WF beam. The surface dose and out‐of‐field dose were lower, but the penumbra was slightly wider. The variation in head scatter and phantom scatter with changes in field size was smaller; the variation in the profile shape with change in depth was also smaller. The eqUF beam is stable 0.072 s after the beam is turned on, and the five‐year beam stability was comparable to that of the WF beam. A fivefold dose rate increase was observed in the eqUF beam with similar beam characteristics to other reported UF beam data except for a deeper dmax and a slightly wider penumbra. The initial and long‐term stability of the eqUF beam profile is on parity with the WF beam. The UF beam profile can be described in the generalized method independently without relying on the WF beam profile.PACS number: 87.55.de

Characteristics and performance of the first commercial multileaf collimator for a robotic radiosurgery system

“…Furthermore, radiochromic films (Gafchromic EBT3, Ashland) were exposed to selected fields, scanned (Epson 1680 pro), and evaluated using ImageJ. 13 Penumbra width (80%-20%, with 100% defined as max dose for fields <50 × 50 mm 2 , and 100% defined as two times the dose at the penumbra inflection point for field sizes >50 × 50 mm 2 , to account for inhomogeneity in the plateau region caused by the absence of a flattening filter 14 ) was derived from water tank commissioning data (SAD 800 mm, depth 15 mm) and assessed as a function of field size (7.6×7.5 to 97.6×97.5 mm 2 ). In addition, the dependence of penumbra width on off-axis position was determined from exposed EBT3 films (delivering elongated fields of 22.6×97.5 mm 2 for X and 110 × 22.5 mm 2 for Y , SAD 800 mm, depth 50 mm).…”

Linac Twins in Radiotherapy

“…The quite unchanged beam quality of 6MV and 6MV FFF shows that not only the linacs are matched but also the FFF mode is matched to the flattened mode [29]. This is not self-evident; the beam hardening of the flattening filter must be compensated by the energy selection [30] that has been performed by the manufacturer.…”

Structural shielding design of a 6 MV flattening filter free linear accelerator: Indian scenario

“…[14] In addition, the lateral dose profile is peaked on the central axis, and less integral target current is required to generate the same dose to the tumor. [1516] As a result, the shielding parameters, such as the tenth-value layers (TVLs) and scatter fractions, calculated for flattened beams, may not be appropriate for shielding evaluations for unflattened beams. [171819] Since FFF beam is used for advanced modalities requiring higher monitor units (MUs) to be delivered, it must be determined whether shielding needs to be enhanced or reduced to use an FFF machine in comparison to vault of FF machine.…”