2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric predictors for acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer: Results of a large statewide observational study

Abstract: In this study, we report the novel finding that gEUD and D2cc, rather than MD, were the most predictive dose metrics for severe esophagitis. To limit the estimated risk of grade ≥3 esophagitis to <5%, thresholds of 59.3 Gy and 68 Gy were identified for gEUD and D2cc, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2010, a Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic report identified limiting mean esophageal dose to <34 Gy as the most significant factor for reducing the risk of grade 3+ RE, a planning goal also recommended in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0617 [11] , [60] . The dosimetric variables analyzed here, D2cc and gEUD, were selected due to recent promising results regarding their use in predicting RE [41] . D2cc is a parameter often used as surrogate for maximum point dose and is commonly used in other settings [61] , [62] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2010, a Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic report identified limiting mean esophageal dose to <34 Gy as the most significant factor for reducing the risk of grade 3+ RE, a planning goal also recommended in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0617 [11] , [60] . The dosimetric variables analyzed here, D2cc and gEUD, were selected due to recent promising results regarding their use in predicting RE [41] . D2cc is a parameter often used as surrogate for maximum point dose and is commonly used in other settings [61] , [62] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced approaches, including normal tissue complication probability modeling and anatomic correction, have shown unclear benefit [27] , [38] , [40] . More recently, a multi-institutional study evaluating multiple dose-volume metrics identified the maximum dose to 2 cubic cm (D2cc) and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) as superior parameters [41] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study also raises a new paradigm to consider in that radiation dose/volume constraints should not simply be based upon clinical toxicity alone, as in the past. 26 Rather, we should constantly be enhancing our radiation dose/volume parameters based upon the more sensitive and clinically meaningful impact that they have on our patients' QOL.…”
Section: Treatment Planning Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RTOG recommendation is to limit oesophagus mean dose to <34 Gy to the oesophagus for lung cancer treatment . A higher oesophageal dose may occur from lung cancer irradiation in some patients due to the proximity of tumour to the oesophagus; a few studies have used 34 Gy as a dose threshold to limit toxicity . Dose reports from other studies found a correlation from 30 Gy .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%