2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Clinical Toxic Effects and Quality of Life as a Function of Radiation Dose and Volume After Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Abstract: An analysis of clinical toxicity and quality of life as a function of radiation dose and volume after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), Advances in Radiation Oncology (2021), doi:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…24 In contrast, single-center papers often report only clinically significant events without standardized definitions. The composite rate of major complications in NAVABLATE (13.3%) is similar to the pooled major complication rates reported in the meta-analyses of percutaneous thermal ablation by Jiang et al (11.5%), 6 Li et al (6%), 25 and Lyons et al (range 7% to 33%) 26 and those reported for SBRT by Devpura et al (5.5%), 27 Timmerman et al (16.4%), 28 and Nyman et al (14.6%). 29 Based on the data in NAVABLATE, transbronchial MWA has a lower pneumothorax rate than percutaneous thermal ablation and a similar adverse event rate to SBRT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…24 In contrast, single-center papers often report only clinically significant events without standardized definitions. The composite rate of major complications in NAVABLATE (13.3%) is similar to the pooled major complication rates reported in the meta-analyses of percutaneous thermal ablation by Jiang et al (11.5%), 6 Li et al (6%), 25 and Lyons et al (range 7% to 33%) 26 and those reported for SBRT by Devpura et al (5.5%), 27 Timmerman et al (16.4%), 28 and Nyman et al (14.6%). 29 Based on the data in NAVABLATE, transbronchial MWA has a lower pneumothorax rate than percutaneous thermal ablation and a similar adverse event rate to SBRT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The first is the lower risk of radiation pneumonitis; the sharp dose distribution of CIRT has the advantage of decreased dosing to normal lung tissue [ 23 , 54 ]. Indeed, the doses to the lungs in the present study were sufficiently low across all indices, with notable differences from previous SBRT studies, particularly the mean lung dose (MLD) and lung V5 [ 14 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. In recent years, in addition to lung V20 [ 51 , 52 ], low-dose lung areas, evaluated using lung V5, 10, etc., and MLD have received increased attention as indicators of dose-associated clinical pneumonitis [ 14 , 55 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Indeed, the doses to the lungs in the present study were sufficiently low across all indices, with notable differences from previous SBRT studies, particularly the mean lung dose (MLD) and lung V5 [ 14 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. In recent years, in addition to lung V20 [ 51 , 52 ], low-dose lung areas, evaluated using lung V5, 10, etc., and MLD have received increased attention as indicators of dose-associated clinical pneumonitis [ 14 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. The reduced low-dose lung area may have led to lower toxicity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Indeed, dosing to the lungs in the present study was su ciently low across all indices, but the most remarkable differences from previous SBRT studies [14,[54][55][56] were the mean lung dose (MLD) and lung V5, which were clearly lower than those in lung V20. In recent years, in addition to lung V20 [49,50], lung low-dose areas, evaluated using lung V5, 10, etc., and MLD, have received increased attention as indicators of dose-associated clinical pneumonitis [14,[54][55][56]. A reduced low-dose lung area may have led to lower toxicity.…”
Section: Cirt Safetycontrasting
confidence: 81%