1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00084891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dorothy Garrod in words and pictures

Abstract: Since her death almost 30 years ago, researchers interested in the life and work of one of the greatest prehistorians of her generation have searched, largely in vain, for material additional to Dorothy Garrod's published work. It seems they need search no longer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My intention in this paper is to re-examine the excavation of the Mousterian Level D at Shukbah, now mentioned only occasionally in the recent literature of the Middle Palaeolithic of south-west Asia (eg, Crew 1975;Jelinek 1982;Bar-Yosef 1998;Meignen 2000;Weinstein-Evron 2003). It has been possible to reconstruct Garrod's approach to the excavation, and her methodology, from surviving original data, including her hand-written excavation notes (Garrod 1928c;Smith et al 1997) which demonstrate her intentions, working methods, and interpretations. The lithic assemblage from Level D was widely distributed but a large proportion has proved traceable (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My intention in this paper is to re-examine the excavation of the Mousterian Level D at Shukbah, now mentioned only occasionally in the recent literature of the Middle Palaeolithic of south-west Asia (eg, Crew 1975;Jelinek 1982;Bar-Yosef 1998;Meignen 2000;Weinstein-Evron 2003). It has been possible to reconstruct Garrod's approach to the excavation, and her methodology, from surviving original data, including her hand-written excavation notes (Garrod 1928c;Smith et al 1997) which demonstrate her intentions, working methods, and interpretations. The lithic assemblage from Level D was widely distributed but a large proportion has proved traceable (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seemed that her private and unpublished papers had not survived. A widely believed myth arose that they had been destroyed, perhaps burnt even by Professor Garrod herself (15). In 1986, her original black and white negatives were donated to the Pitt Rivers Museum by her prehistorian colleague and executor Suzanne Cassou de Saint Mathurin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our information about the "classic" site and cemetery of Shukbah remains dependent on the findings and interpretations that Garrod left us in her reports. In the light of this, the recent recovery of her hand-written field notebooks (Smith et al 1997) presents us with a welcome opportunity to revisit the archaeological evidence and place it in the context of more recent studies. What follows is a re-appraisal of the Shukbah burials, arguing from the field notes as well as the published data.…”
Section: Shukbah Cave and Its Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%