1973
DOI: 10.1177/001391657300500406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dormitory Density and Helping Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, stamped, addressed letters without a return address were placed on hallway floors in college dormitories that were 22-25 storeys, 4-7 storeys, or 2-4 storeys (Bickman et al, 1973). The number of letters mailed was the measure of prosocial behavior.…”
Section: Housing Form and Prosocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, stamped, addressed letters without a return address were placed on hallway floors in college dormitories that were 22-25 storeys, 4-7 storeys, or 2-4 storeys (Bickman et al, 1973). The number of letters mailed was the measure of prosocial behavior.…”
Section: Housing Form and Prosocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Baum and Val ins ( 1973) observed that students at SUNY., Stony Brook rated corridor design dorms as more crowded than suite-design dorms, presumably because the former provide less shielding from unwanted social interaction than the latter. Bickman, Teger, Gabriele et al ( 1973), in a field study employing the "lost letter technique" (Milgram, 1969), found that residents of high density dorms were less likely to enact altruistic behavior than those of low density dwellings. These results were explained in terms of Milgram's ( 1970) analysis of adaptation to overload, which posits a pattern of decreased involvement with others as a means of avoiding excessive stimulation under conditions of high density.…”
Section: Overload Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the effects of long-term exposure do not generally lend themselves to field experiments. However, Bickman et al (1973) did use such a procedure to examine the effects of number of persons per structure (p.p.s.) on behaviour and attitudes of residents of different university dormitories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%