2020
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2019.2943626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler Ultrasound Technology for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: A Review

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(157 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [52] introduced a PPG system for fetal heart rate monitoring involving a bandpass filter (BFP) in the range of 710-740 Hz from the abdomen of the mother, a cut-off frequency of the reference signal kept at 15 Hz, and the signal is downsampled to 55 Hz, followed by a bandpass filter of 0. The FECG signals were captured invasively using PPG electrodes, and the experiment procedure and signal processing successfully removed the noise and maternal artefacts from the FECG signal [52,58].…”
Section: Photoplethysmography (Ppg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [52] introduced a PPG system for fetal heart rate monitoring involving a bandpass filter (BFP) in the range of 710-740 Hz from the abdomen of the mother, a cut-off frequency of the reference signal kept at 15 Hz, and the signal is downsampled to 55 Hz, followed by a bandpass filter of 0. The FECG signals were captured invasively using PPG electrodes, and the experiment procedure and signal processing successfully removed the noise and maternal artefacts from the FECG signal [52,58].…”
Section: Photoplethysmography (Ppg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of ultrasonic radar is not interrupted like IR sensors [6]. High-impact application of ultrasonic radar includes tracking of heartbeats [7] and evaluation of group velocity [8], tracking a large area and wireless distance measuring [9], and obstacle detection in robotics [6].…”
Section: Fig 1 Outfit Ultrasonic Radar and How It Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these makes practically impossible to indicate points equivalent to the R-waves in FECG [38]. Therefore, for FHR determination based on the US signal, correlation methods considering the full impulse shape are used [33,35,[39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of the heartbeat occurrence, based on a simple peak detection in looking for characteristic component, is very inaccurate due to its variable shape [ 23 , 34 ]. In addition, any interfering impulses of sufficiently high amplitude can be identified as successive beats [ 23 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. All of these makes practically impossible to indicate points equivalent to the R-waves in FECG [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%