2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.245429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping of graphene by a Au(111) substrate: Calculation strategy within the local density approximation and a semiempirical van der Waals approach

Abstract: We have performed a density functional study of graphene adsorbed on Au(111) surface using both a local density approximation and a semiempirical van der Waals approach proposed by Grimme, known as the DFT-D2 method. Graphene physisorbed on metal has the linear dispersion preserved in the band-structure, but the Fermi level of the system is shifted with respect to the conical points which results in a doping effect. We show that the type and amount of doping depends not only on the choice of the exchange-corre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

17
74
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
17
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is in contrast to the case of Au(111), where doping is essentially negligible. The doping of perfect monolayer graphene has also been shown to depend sensitively on the type of metal substrate, even in the weak bonding case [37][38][39][40] (see also the discussion in the Supplement).…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is in contrast to the case of Au(111), where doping is essentially negligible. The doping of perfect monolayer graphene has also been shown to depend sensitively on the type of metal substrate, even in the weak bonding case [37][38][39][40] (see also the discussion in the Supplement).…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our recent work, we have analyzed the correlation between the adsorption geometry and electronic properties of the graphene/Au(111) interface and we have shown the influence of the geometry parameters characterizing the modeled system 17 . We focused mainly on the aspects related to the strategy of the calculations, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results in doping by the holes (electrons) transferred from a metal to graphene which becomes p-type (n-type) doped. According to most of the theoretical studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , graphene on Al, Ag and Cu is n-type doped, while interaction with Au and Pt(111) surfaces seems to cause p-type doping. Although the particular DFT calculations can lead to different values of the doping level for the same metal, it is usually assumed that one type of substrate implies definite type and level of doping and any contradictions are related to the limitations of ab initio methods whose results depend on the choice of the exchange-correlation interaction and on the calculation strategy 17 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourth, dI/dV measurements indicate that the Dirac point of graphene on the Au(111) surface is located at ∼ E F [38], which indicates that no appreciable doping of graphene exists for graphene/Au. DFT calculations show small shifts of the Dirac point for graphene on Au [88,92,[115][116][117]. ARPES measurements show that an intercalated Au layer can electronically decouple graphene from the substrate for graphene on Ru(0001) [118], graphene on Ni(111) [119,120], and graphene on SiC [121].…”
Section: Weakly Interacting Graphene/metal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%