Virtually all neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have metastatic potential, and up to 20% of the cases present as metastasis from an occult primary [1][2][3]. The identification of the primary site is an important step toward the correct management of the patient, particularly when dealing with a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET), as therapeutic approach may vary depending on the site and cell type. In contrast, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), independent of the primary site, are currently treated with platinum-based regimens, and the role of the pathologist may be limited to the distinction between a visceral NEC and a Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin, because the latter requires wide local excision, sentinel node biopsy, and, possibly, radiotherapy. In contrast, thorough morphological and immunohistochemical analyses are expected to give important clues to the recognition of the site of origin of a metastatic NET. Among all NETs, the tendency to metastasize is highest for those of pancreatic origin, followed by small intestinal, colonic, pulmonary, and gastric neoplasms [1]. Irrespective of the primary site, the liver represents the most frequent location of