1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine ligands and the stimulus effects of amphetamine: animal models versus human laboratory data

Abstract: Studies with laboratory animals have consistently demonstrated a role for dopamine in mediating the discriminative stimulus (i.e., interoceptive) effects of amphetamine. For example, D2 dopamine agonists mimic the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine and D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists generally block them. The discriminative stimulus effects of drugs in animals are believed to parallel their subjective effects in humans. Therefore, it is often assumed that dopamine plays a role in amphetamine-induced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
47
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
7
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slowing of RT to motivationally irrelevant, neutral words by AMPH in the two subgroups of problem gamblers is suggestive of such a dopaminergic modulating effect. However, although AMPH is primarily associated with dopamine activation, the drug also engages other neurochemical systems (see Brauer et al, 1997). Therefore, the present findings for gamblers cannot be exclusively attributed to dopamine activation.…”
Section: Lexical Salience Task and Amph-induced Semantic Activationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slowing of RT to motivationally irrelevant, neutral words by AMPH in the two subgroups of problem gamblers is suggestive of such a dopaminergic modulating effect. However, although AMPH is primarily associated with dopamine activation, the drug also engages other neurochemical systems (see Brauer et al, 1997). Therefore, the present findings for gamblers cannot be exclusively attributed to dopamine activation.…”
Section: Lexical Salience Task and Amph-induced Semantic Activationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Research with animals further indicates that the discriminative stimulus properties of alcohol are unlike those of AMPH (Druhan et al, 1991). The AMPH stimulus primarily involves mono-amine activation (Brauer et al, 1997;Furmidge et al, 1991;Ranaldi et al, 2000;Sasaki et al, 1995), whereas the alcohol stimulus primarily involves GABA-A activation and glutamate inhibition (Jackson et al, 2003;Kostowski and Bienkowski, 1999;Shelton and Grant, 2002;Stolerman and Olufsen, 2001), along with some serotonergic elements (Maurel et al, 1997). In animal studies, systemic AMPH, at a range of doses, does not reliably prime alcohol seeking in animals familiar with alcohol (Halladay et al, 1999;Hubbell et al, 1991;Linseman, 1990), but consistently primes seeking of another psychostimulantFcocaineFin animals familiar with cocaine (de Wit and Stewart, 1981;Lynch et al, 1998;Schenk and Partridge, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 Moreover, schizophrenic patients continue to take drugs of abuse even when medicated with neuroleptics. 85 What is a possible explanation for the discrepancy in the animal and human studies?…”
Section: Treatment Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugs that block DA receptors such as neuroleptics interfere with the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse in laboratory animals (De Wit and Wise, 1977), but in humans some studies report decreases in the reinforcing effects of drugs while others do not (Brauer et al, 1997). Moreover, neuroleptics medication maybe one of potential factors contributing to stimulant abuse in schizophrenics (LeDuc and Mittleman, 1995).…”
Section: Da and Heroin Addiction Treatment Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%