2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-014-9517-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donors in a Dictatorship: Giving, Civil Society, and Democratic Action in Communist East Germany

Abstract: This history of charitable collections in the East German dictatorship (the Protestant organized Bread for the World and the student-led Initiative: Hope for Nicaragua) analyzes the relationship between philanthropy, civil society, and democratic action. These collections, widely unknown outside of the former German Democratic Republic, indicate that independent associations could form to organize philanthropic collections for international causes in this dictatorship. These groups provided the basis for actio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially limited to collections at Advent, East Germans gave money throughout the year, and on a number of occasions, special collections were called in the summer to aid catastrophe victims. People also granted money to the program through their wills, an option exercised by East Germans without children in the GDR (Witkowski, 2015b).…”
Section: The Money Illusion and Bread For The Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially limited to collections at Advent, East Germans gave money throughout the year, and on a number of occasions, special collections were called in the summer to aid catastrophe victims. People also granted money to the program through their wills, an option exercised by East Germans without children in the GDR (Witkowski, 2015b).…”
Section: The Money Illusion and Bread For The Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36-46). On the other side, scholars often consider philanthropy and the networks of trust it creates as a basis of public participation even under authoritarian regimes (McCarthy, 2003;Witkowski, 2015). These studies imbue associations and philanthropy with normative features, rather than considering associational and philanthropic practices as specific components of the broader civil society project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%