2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.165338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor states in modulation-doped Si/SiGe heterostructures

Abstract: We present a unified approach for calculating the properties of shallow donors inside or outside heterostructure quantum wells. The method allows us to obtain not only the binding energies of all localized states of any symmetry, but also the energy width of the resonant states which may appear when a localized state becomes degenerate with the continuous quantum well subbands. The approach is non-variational, and we are therefore also able to evaluate the wave functions. This is used to calculate the optical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expectation is correct if only the CCS channel contributes, but it is no longer so when the RSS channel is included because the width of the resonant level ⌫͑z 0 ͒ depends on the position z 0 in a complicated way. 7 In fact, in the present sample structure, ⌫͑z 0 ͒ attains its maximum value when z 0 is in the quantum well and about 8 Å from one interface. Such behavior of the broadening of the resonant level also introduces a weak dependence of the interface roughness scattering on the position of the ␦-doping layer.…”
Section: Drift Velocitymentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This expectation is correct if only the CCS channel contributes, but it is no longer so when the RSS channel is included because the width of the resonant level ⌫͑z 0 ͒ depends on the position z 0 in a complicated way. 7 In fact, in the present sample structure, ⌫͑z 0 ͒ attains its maximum value when z 0 is in the quantum well and about 8 Å from one interface. Such behavior of the broadening of the resonant level also introduces a weak dependence of the interface roughness scattering on the position of the ␦-doping layer.…”
Section: Drift Velocitymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The first channel which we call conventional Coulomb scattering ͑CCS͒ will be treated as conventional potential scattering, while the second resonant state scattering ͑RSS͒ channel will be analyzed in more details in the next section. As an approximation, which typically is well justified, 4,7 we can ignore the cross term ͑see below͒ and treat the two scattering channels independently.…”
Section: ͑12͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations