2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2019.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant control of climate variations over land-use change on net primary productivity under different urbanization intensities in Beijing, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The driving factors of NPP have been examined through previous research 14 , 17 . Due to the complexity of urban spatial heterogeneity, the coefficients of different factors varied by land use and region under different urbanization intensities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The driving factors of NPP have been examined through previous research 14 , 17 . Due to the complexity of urban spatial heterogeneity, the coefficients of different factors varied by land use and region under different urbanization intensities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbanization has two opposite impacts on vegetation depending on different urban development stages 14 18 . Rapid urban expansion leads to a dramatic reduction in natural vegetation and cropland, which is a direct impact 14 , especially appear in the newly expanded urban areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, field surveys take a great deal of time and manpower, so they are often used in single ecosystems, such as grassland and soil carbon pool [14]. In addition, some studies use remote sensing data and the CASA model to assess carbon storage [25,26]. Since remote sensing data can reflect the actual growth of vegetation, this method can obtain more accurate results and reflect the spatial heterogeneity of carbon reserves in each land-use type.…”
Section: Comparison Of Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%