2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0730-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain-specific reports of visual imagery vividness are not related to perceptual expertise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this session, participants completed 4 behavioral tasks (1 measuring visual imagery vividness, 2 measuring performance for cars and other domains, and 1 measure for self-reports of visual expertise). First, participants completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; [ 40 ]) and 2 additional car imagery questions [ 35 ]. The VVIQ measures self-reported individual differences in visual imagery and has been used in behavioral (e.g., [ 41 ]) and imaging work [ 18 , 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During this session, participants completed 4 behavioral tasks (1 measuring visual imagery vividness, 2 measuring performance for cars and other domains, and 1 measure for self-reports of visual expertise). First, participants completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; [ 40 ]) and 2 additional car imagery questions [ 35 ]. The VVIQ measures self-reported individual differences in visual imagery and has been used in behavioral (e.g., [ 41 ]) and imaging work [ 18 , 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We asked if imagery of faces and cars engages face-selective fusiform regions in above-average car recognizers, basing this prediction on evidence that perception of faces and cars engage these regions in comparable populations. In recent work measuring individual differences in the vividness of mental imagery, we found that the vividness of domain-specific imagery (for cars) relates to that of domain-general imagery, but not to perceptual or semantic knowledge ability levels with cars [ 35 ]. Therefore, it is unclear whether during car imagery, those with above-average car recognition ability would recruit face-selective areas that are engaged during car perception (where the selectivity has been found to predict car recognition ability), or would recruit only object-selective regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study on visual imagery during music listening therefore had three main goals: To estimate the prevalence of visual imagery during music listening and collect detailed insights into the different kinds of visual imagery people experience while listening to music.To explore how visual imagery in response to music is different from visual imagery in general.To investigate how visual imagery correlates with domain-specific skills (Sunday et al, 2017). …”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, specific expertise in a perceptual domain does not necessarily lead to enhanced vividness of visual imagery in that domain. Sunday, McGugin, and Gauthier (2017) showed that domain-specific imagery (tested with car experts) correlates with general vividness of imagery but not with perceptual or semantic expertise. Whether or not the same lack of domain-specific imagery abilities would be found in music experts still remains to be tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Expertise effects are fundamentally memory effects, because it is what is stored in memory that leads one to be an expert (Chase & Simon, 1973). However, many studies of expertise effects examine perceptual and attentional differences rather than explicitly testing memory or forgetting (e.g., Reeder, Stein, & Peelen, 2016; Sunday, McGugin, & Gauthier, 2017). Therefore whether objects of expertise, such as faces, are susceptible to recognition-induced forgetting remains unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%