2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2017.8257982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain-specific hierarchical subgraph extraction: A recommendation use case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the example in Figure 1, we extract a subgraph that includes the purple nodes because they are directly connected to green and/or blue nodes. Personalized PageRank (PPR) to Filter Context: KGs are typically very large, and concept expansion by just one hop can introduce a significant amount of noise Lalithsena et al 2017). For example, the concept girl is directly connected to over 1000 other concepts in ConceptNet.…”
Section: Subgraph Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example in Figure 1, we extract a subgraph that includes the purple nodes because they are directly connected to green and/or blue nodes. Personalized PageRank (PPR) to Filter Context: KGs are typically very large, and concept expansion by just one hop can introduce a significant amount of noise Lalithsena et al 2017). For example, the concept girl is directly connected to over 1000 other concepts in ConceptNet.…”
Section: Subgraph Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correctness of knowledge added to KGs also depend on its temporal validity. Temporally changing relationships to define the relatedness between entities to model domain-specific [10] and temporal multirelational data is another concern deserving significant attention.…”
Section: Challenge 5: Quality and Validity Of Kgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correctness of knowledge added to KGs also depend on its temporal validity. Temporally changing relationships to define the relatedness between entities to model domain-specific [10] and temporal multirelational data is another concern deserving significant attention. Challenge 6: Adaptive Knowledge Network Change is a law of nature, and static KGs like DBpedia fail to capture this dynamic flow of information.…”
Section: Challenge 5: Quality and Validity Of Kgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MLNs use discrete logic to construct a MRF over discrete random variables, PSL uses soft logic to construct a special kind of MRF over continuous random variables in range [0, 1] called a hinge-loss Markov random field (HLMRF). PSL and MLNs have achieved state-of-the-art results in various domains such as recommender systems (Kouki et al 2017;Lalithsena et al 2017;Choi et al 2015), bioinformatics (Sridhar et al 2016), natural language processing (Ebrahimi et al 2016;Johnson et al 2017;Khot et al 2015;Beltagy et al 2013), product search (Alshukaili et al 2016;Platanios et al 2017;Srinivasan et al 2019), fake news detection (Chowdhury et al 2020) and social network analysis (Farnadi et al 2017;Chen et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%