2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain Randomization and Pyramid Consistency: Simulation-to-Real Generalization Without Accessing Target Domain Data

Abstract: We propose to harness the potential of simulation for the semantic segmentation of real-world self-driving scenes in a domain generalization fashion. The segmentation network is trained without any data of target domains and tested on the unseen target domains. To this end, we propose a new approach of domain randomization and pyramid consistency to learn a model with high generalizability. First, we propose to randomize the synthetic images with the styles of real images in terms of visual appearances using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
251
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(265 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
251
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we tackle the DG problem by synthesising data from unseen domains. We assume that augmenting the original training data of source domains with synthetic data from unseen domains could make the task model intrinsically more domain-generalisable (Tobin et al 2017;Yue et al 2019). To this end, a novel framework based on Deep Domain-Adversarial Image Generation (DDAIG) is introduced, which is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we tackle the DG problem by synthesising data from unseen domains. We assume that augmenting the original training data of source domains with synthetic data from unseen domains could make the task model intrinsically more domain-generalisable (Tobin et al 2017;Yue et al 2019). To this end, a novel framework based on Deep Domain-Adversarial Image Generation (DDAIG) is introduced, which is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the test data is not available during training due to some restriction, e.g., pertaining to resources or privacy issues, generalizing to the test domain is important. We experimented with our method in a multi-auxiliary domain generalization setting [62]. Here, we chose a domain from the target domains as a test domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we cannot access the target data due to privacy issues [45], [51], [58], generalizing to an unseen domain is also necessary. We also experimented on a multitarget domain adaptation setting [2], [11], which aims to simultaneously adapt to multiple target domains, and a multiauxiliary domain generalization setting [60], which aims to generalize to an unseen test domain utilizing knowledge from auxiliary domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain generalization for semantic segmentation has seen less progress due to its task difficulty (pixel-wise classification) compared to classification. Recent works are modelbased [10], embedding domain generalization capability into the model by modifying the model structure, or data-based [11], augmenting source domain data with styles from additional datasets (e.g., ImageNet [12]). Although yielding positive results, their performance depend heavily on the style variance of the additional data introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%