2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain orientation imaging of PMN–PT single crystals by vertical and lateral piezoresponse force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the spatial inhomogeneous domains found on the rhombohedral‐based PMN–30 wt% PT 25 . In general, it is commonly accepted that the spatial inhomogeneity of the domains can be attributed to the influence of the random field, which acts in the reorientation and merge of the polar clusters 25,26 . Specifically, PZN is a typical relaxor in which the formation of long‐range ferroelectric order under zero‐field cooling is prevented by random fields induced by build‐in charge disorder.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with the spatial inhomogeneous domains found on the rhombohedral‐based PMN–30 wt% PT 25 . In general, it is commonly accepted that the spatial inhomogeneity of the domains can be attributed to the influence of the random field, which acts in the reorientation and merge of the polar clusters 25,26 . Specifically, PZN is a typical relaxor in which the formation of long‐range ferroelectric order under zero‐field cooling is prevented by random fields induced by build‐in charge disorder.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3(a), in which smaller domains are merged to form larger clusters. This result is consistent with the spatial inhomogeneous domains found on the rhombohedral‐based PMN–30 wt% PT 25 . In general, it is commonly accepted that the spatial inhomogeneity of the domains can be attributed to the influence of the random field, which acts in the reorientation and merge of the polar clusters 25,26 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For characterization of ferroelectric domain or domain boundary structures, a variety of techniques have been employed, such as X-ray and neutron diffraction techniques, 15,22 transmission electron microscopy (TEM), 19 polarized light microscopy (PLM), 16,[23][24][25] and PFM. [25][26][27][28] Using PFM, Zeng et al 26 Although PFM is capable of revealing the domain morphologies in nanoscale, and measuring the piezoelectric response of individual domains simultaneously, it is unable to detect the phase symmetry of the ferroelectric domains. Besides, PFM only measures surface layer of the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second electron image (topography image) and the electron acoustic image (domain image) are simultaneously obtained in SEAM. Piezoresponse force microscopy was used to image ferroelectric domain in the near surface of the sample based on the detection of piezoelectric vibration under the tip due to converse piezoelectric effects [18][19][20]. In PFM, one of the main crystal faces was electroded by silver paste and glued to the PFM sample holder; the opposite surface was subjected to PFM study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%