2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing the right thing? (Re) Considering risk assessment and safety planning in child protection work with domestic violence cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten studies were based in high-income countries: the UK, 35 39 40 the USA, 41–43 Australia, 44 45 Ireland 32 and Canada. 46 One study was based in a middle-income country, Brazil. 47…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ten studies were based in high-income countries: the UK, 35 39 40 the USA, 41–43 Australia, 44 45 Ireland 32 and Canada. 46 One study was based in a middle-income country, Brazil. 47…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCPs included physicians 37 41 and nurses 37 42 47 from primary and secondary healthcare. SSPs were drawn from children’s social services, 35 child protection services 46 and unspecified settings. 40 41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IPV exposure, past research showed that resolution of IPV after CPS involvement was significantly associated with the child’s mental and behavior outcomes [ 54 ]. Despite that, a lack of coordination between CPS and IPV response agencies is not uncommon [ 55 , 56 ]. In Japan, because treatment of IPV is beyond the competence of CGC, and workers tend to consider cases of witness IPV as “low risk” or safer than other life-threatening maltreatment incidents, their cases will be closed even without providing sufficient help to children or families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that their use of placating strategies was to excuse the violence and appease the abuser in order to minimize the impact of the abuse (Brabeck & Guzman, 2008;Meyer, Wagner & Dutton, 2010). There are two forms of risk in domestic abuse 'batterer-generated', such as physical and psychological harm, and 'life-generated', such as financial risk, and women staying in an abusive relationship may wish to avoid any life-generated risk when leaving their abusive partner (Jenney et al, 2014).…”
Section: Use Of Coping Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%