2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12199-018-0703-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative risk effect of household dysfunction for child maltreatment after intensive intervention of the child protection system in Japan: a longitudinal analysis

Abstract: BackgroundBuilding an effective casework system for child maltreatment is a global issue. We estimated the effect of household dysfunction (i.e., interparental violence, caregiver mental health problems, and caregiver substance abuse) on child maltreatment to understand how to advance the current framework of child welfare.MethodsThe sample comprised 759 children (1- to 17-year-old; mean age was 10.6; 404 boys and 355 girls) placed in temporary custody units (one of the strongest intervention of the Japanese c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Felitti et al showed a high correlation between different [34]. A study from Ohashi and colleagues showed in a Japanese sample that the risk for child maltreatment increases with the number of ACEs related to household dysfunction [35]. In an Australian study, where a sample of 7223 mothers and their offspring was assessed, odds for maltreatment ranged between 2.0 and 3.5 in case of IPV in dependence of maltreatment subtype and gender of the child [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Felitti et al showed a high correlation between different [34]. A study from Ohashi and colleagues showed in a Japanese sample that the risk for child maltreatment increases with the number of ACEs related to household dysfunction [35]. In an Australian study, where a sample of 7223 mothers and their offspring was assessed, odds for maltreatment ranged between 2.0 and 3.5 in case of IPV in dependence of maltreatment subtype and gender of the child [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a later analyses based on the same data, Felitti et al showed increased ratios for child maltreatment in case of household substance abuse (odds ranging between 2.1–3.0 in dependence of the subtype of maltreatment), mental illness (odds 2.1–4.2), domestic violence (odds 2.5–5.9), incarcerated household member (odds 2.3–2.7) and parental separation (odds 2.0–2.6) [34]. A study from Ohashi and colleagues showed in a Japanese sample that the risk for child maltreatment increases with the number of ACEs related to household dysfunction [35]. In an Australian study, where a sample of 7223 mothers and their offspring was assessed, odds for maltreatment ranged between 2.0 and 3.5 in case of IPV in dependence of maltreatment subtype and gender of the child [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common explanation for the association between involvement with CWS and premature mortality is that the problems in the family of origin deprive a child from reaching their full developmental potential. Greater exposure to household dysfunction is related to registration with child welfare and to having been the victim of maltreatment (Ohashi et al, 2018). Nonetheless, relatively few studies have examined the differential relationships between household dysfunction and CWS involvement explicitly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACE subtypes were usually generated by discrete groups with similar patterns of ACE exposure [ 9 ]. Evidence suggests that in many young people, ACEs with significant interrelations between the different types or groups [ 10 , 11 ] usually occur simultaneously in multiple rather than simple forms and have cumulative effects [ 9 , 12 ]. In the surveys undertaken in eight eastern European countries to evaluate ACEs among young adults, the results showed that over half of the respondents reported at least one ACE, and experience of one ACE increased the probability of having other ACEs [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%