Does YouTube Provide Qualified Patient Education Videos About Atrial Fibrillation?

Abstract

ObjectivePatients utilize the internet as a pathway to acquire knowledge of specific diseases. However, there are limited oversight and review mechanisms to ensure the authenticity of online information. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of video-based resources used to obtain information about atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsMultiple AF-specific keywords were used to perform a systematic search of YouTube. Two independent reviewers reviewed the top 50 results of each keyword search. To record data, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, modified DISCERN score, AF-specific score (AFSS), and essential score (Escore) were used. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for intergroup comparisons.ResultsA total of 74 videos that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. In terms of video quality, 68% were poor, 19% were moderate, and 13% were exceptional. Videos submitted by publishers with a medical background were much less popular (p < 0.05) than those submitted by publishers without a medical background. The video quality did not differ among those included in this study.ConclusionsSome videos on YouTube that are of real value are not as popular as those with low-quality content submitted by news agencies/media publishers. Furthermore, videos submitted by those with a medical background do not receive as much attention as others. It is important to acknowledge that video platforms should establish content and quality auditing mechanisms for videos. Furthermore, publishers should ensure that viewers receive accurate and complete knowledge and use more concise and accessible images or animations that are tailored to the audience.

TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis

“…Firstly, our sample only includes videos uploaded on Chinese TikTok platforms, limiting the generalizability of our results to other languages (e.g., English) and platforms (e.g., Kwai). Despite the platform-specific focus on Chinese TikTok, our study draws parallels with research on YouTube atrial fibrillation videos, indicating consistently low video quality (50). Given the representative nature of atrial fibrillation as a common cardiovascular disease, we believe our findings may be applicable to other languages or platforms, such as international versions of TikTok and YouTube.…”

Evaluating YouTube Videos as a High-Quality Educational Resource for Patients Contemplating Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

“…7 Additionally, this metric has been previously used in literature to evaluate quality and reliability of medical information on YouTube videos. [8][9][10] The modified DISCERN scoring criteria uses 5 questions to assess the quality of a video for medical education. Each question is ranked on a score of 1-5, giving the video an overall score of 5-25.…”

Educational quality of YouTube content on brachial plexus injury and treatment

“…In 2012, Singh et al modified the DISCERN criteria to a shorter version more appropriate for analyzing the quality of a rising number of internet videos about all information surrounding a medical condition—not only treatment (Singh et al, 2012). This modified 5‐point DISCERN quality scale has become an established and accepted scale for analyzing the reliability of internet videos (Delli et al, 2016; Li et al, 2022; Luo et al, 2022; Oremule et al, 2019; Radonjic et al, 2020). Higher scores obtained indicate higher reliability of information (Table 1).…”